You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(Related to GROUP BY test failures) Current implementation of GROUP BY has the correct behavior for the case when creating groups for a value that's NULL in one binding tuple and MISSING in another (as defined in section 11.1.1). But for the edge case of when the value is just MISSING, the group uses NULL as the tuple value rather than MISSING.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current behavior in partiql-lang-rust is correct. That is, a group key of MISSING should coerce to NULL even when all the values are MISSING. The conformance tests that were ported from Kotlin need to be fixed for this case.
(Related to
GROUP BY
test failures) Current implementation ofGROUP BY
has the correct behavior for the case when creating groups for a value that'sNULL
in one binding tuple andMISSING
in another (as defined in section 11.1.1). But for the edge case of when the value is justMISSING
, the group usesNULL
as the tuple value rather thanMISSING
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: