Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is custom G-code still required for Prusa Slicer 2.7+ #80

Open
puterboy opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Is custom G-code still required for Prusa Slicer 2.7+ #80

puterboy opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@puterboy
Copy link

puterboy commented Dec 3, 2023

It seems like Prusa Slicer 2.7 has an option under "Print Settings->Output options" to "Label Objects" with "Octoprint Comments".
Supposedly this is to enable canceling of objects.

Before 2.7, I had to add the following line to: [Printer Settings]->Custom G-code: End G-code
; printing object ENDGCODE

Is this still necessary if I turn on the "Octoprint Comments" option?
I am a bit confused on how this all works...

@puterboy
Copy link
Author

puterboy commented Dec 3, 2023

NOTE that based on experimentation, it seems like it is not necessary but still would like to confirm officially.

@paukstelis
Copy link
Owner

While it isn't strictly necessary, It is still recommended to add that to the end gcode. The reason for this is that if you cancel the last object to be printed, everything AFTER the last object will also be cancelled. By adding the comment you ensure that all the commands after the last object will be executed.

@puterboy
Copy link
Author

puterboy commented Dec 4, 2023

Thanks - that wasn't obvious to me :) - perhaps add to README documentation?`

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants