You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pdstools.
Issue description
The Feature Importance for NB models calculated by PDS tools isn't the same as in platform
The R version has a subtle issue not using the right laplace smoothing (1 rather than 1/#bins)
The Python version seems totally off, not calculating the diff from the mean and not scaling
Platform suffers from same issues as python implementation, tracking this under BUG-880410
Reproducible example
SeeExcelsheetforanalysis
Expected behavior
All versions should give the exact same results
Installed versions
n/a, issues have been around for a while
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Lets park this one for a little, I am not certain on the solution. Explored a lot of things, then found that many of the variations are (very) strongly correlated, even with univariate AUC. So made this much lower prio for myself. Will pick up post v4 release, still valid, but not urgent.
pdstools version checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pdstools.
Issue description
The Feature Importance for NB models calculated by PDS tools isn't the same as in platform
The R version has a subtle issue not using the right laplace smoothing (1 rather than 1/#bins)
The Python version seems totally off, not calculating the diff from the mean and not scaling
Platform suffers from same issues as python implementation, tracking this under BUG-880410
Reproducible example
Expected behavior
All versions should give the exact same results
Installed versions
n/a, issues have been around for a while
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: