-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
technologies for OCK next steps #29
Comments
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 4:09 PM Simon Worthington ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
I have a presentation for TIB colleagues tomorrow 29th Oct and I need to
ask a couple of questions about the 'thoughts' on technology routes for
OCKs proposed next steps. And whether there are: existing systems in place,
choices already made, routes contemplated, or explorations being made.
- Building an open metadata or/and document repository - so how we
could present the data collated by OCK in a usable form to the public?
The bibliographic metadata from JATS is extremely comprehensive (see (e.g.)
https://github.com/petermr/climate/tree/master/searches/clim107/PMC3828158/sections/0_front
and browse down
also
https://github.com/petermr/climate/tree/master/searches/clim107/PMC3828158/sections/2_back
which contains the ref-list (citations).
This allows us easily to extract all bibliographic metadata and (say) build
a citation graph (though of course only in the closed set)
How it's presented is a UX question and we need volunteers
- Knowledge Graph creation?
I would like to be able to present the current view on these two parts of
the project as if we need input I can see what people can offer, or have
ideas about.
I will try to write something this evening about knowledge graph. It's
basically the sum of articles, extracted components, dictionary
annotations. It's starting to become useful for our medicinal plant project
where we have very good standardised tables and sections. This *might*
happen in some subsections of climate
I have created a CMIP project which has ca 930 open access papers. I think
this will be very tractable as it's full of acronyms. Will depend on A+A
beng involved.
Thanks
…
Simon
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#29?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAFTCS2NDQLZQK2HV6IQ7S3QQ4FERA5CNFSM4JF4RGL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HUZ5XTQ>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFTCS7ZRUEHTPQJT3SDUQDQQ4FERANCNFSM4JF4RGLQ>
.
--
Peter Murray-Rust
Founder ContentMine.org
and
Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics
Dept. Of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
I have a presentation for TIB colleagues tomorrow 29th Oct and I need to ask a couple of questions about the 'thoughts' on technology routes for OCKs proposed next steps. And whether there are: existing systems in place, choices already made, routes contemplated, or explorations being made.
I would like to be able to present the current view on these two parts of the project as if we need input I can see what people can offer, or have ideas about.
Thanks
Simon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: