Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Random fitness/precision result from token replay #148

Closed
fmannhardt opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Random fitness/precision result from token replay #148

fmannhardt opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@fmannhardt
Copy link
Contributor

We have got a bug report over at the R pm4py binding that the token replay (which we have as a default -- which should be changed I guess) gives back random results for the same model and event log when called multiple times. You can find the original bug report here:
bupaverse/pm4py#6

Is this expected behaviour? If not I can try to make the test model and log available.

@fit-alessandro-berti
Copy link
Contributor

Dear Felix,

We are aware of some problems if the model contains duplicate transitions (the method cannot handle duplicate transitions properly; hence in the last release we introduced a new version of the token-based replay based on a backwards state space exploration)

However, if the model does not contain duplicate transitions, then it's weird. If you can please provide us the test model and log

Sincerely
Alessandro

@fmannhardt
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is the model:

image

But, I just checked it directly with PM4Py and the token replay gives consistent results. It does not find that the model perfectly fits all traces (alignment-based fitness is 1.0) but it gives always the same fitness of 0.96905...

I will investigate what goes wrong in the automatic conversion from R.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants