You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As @grahamc pointed out in #438, the usage example at the time of his change indicated that if you don't have a home, you aren't a Person. That's a rather poor statement to be making in a tutorial. We've merged a change to correct that, however, using Person as an example seems open to other unintentional slights or poor examples.
I suggest that to avoid any potential issues in the future, I think that switching from person to something like animal classification would be a better example here.
I am willing to help whoever wants to handle this issue. I am a Bioinformatician and have worked on the Tutorial before so can help guide the rewrite to using animal classification.
Funnily enough I have worked in taxonomy before so am aware of the debates therein, however this change is about switching to a more welcoming example not about animal taxonomy itself.
As @grahamc pointed out in #438, the usage example at the time of his change indicated that if you don't have a home, you aren't a Person. That's a rather poor statement to be making in a tutorial. We've merged a change to correct that, however, using Person as an example seems open to other unintentional slights or poor examples.
I suggest that to avoid any potential issues in the future, I think that switching from person to something like animal classification would be a better example here.
https://a-z-animals.com/reference/animal-classification/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: