-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Recommended build environment for Loom now with Python3? #15
Comments
For example, the current build issue appears to come with Python scripts happening as part of The virtualenv was created with
|
Separately, we are trying to compile for ARM64 and get a variety of issues:
Is it expected that this library only work on AMD / x86_64 ? |
Hi @ships, I'd love for loom to have reproducible modern builds. Recently @emilyfertig has been updating loom & distributions, and is probably your best contact. I'm happy to review PRs, push releases, and answer questions. Re: aarch64, this may be a more significant effort. The scariest issue is that loom uses some lock-free data structures internally, and I believe existing code relies on x86 semantics. It might be possible to simply disable lock-free stuff if not on x86, but that's just a guess. |
Hi friends, I am trying to build a reproducible environment using both Docker and Nix that can run the latest Loom and Distributions.
I have had problems recently with compiling distributions on current head of main on ubuntu 20.04 because the GCC version is too new, but I see some references to later python versions like 3.10 that are not supported until 20.04 or later.
While I still have some threads to chase down in my build issues, I would love to know, what sort of compile and build environments and targets are you testing on internally ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: