-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ChangeLog
175 lines (147 loc) · 9.48 KB
/
ChangeLog
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
fonts-indic
Current Version :- 2.4.3
* Wed Sep 09 2009 Pravin Satpute <[email protected]> - 2.4.3
- updated conf file for all language
- added changelog for individual lang
- modified makedist.sh generate.sh for releasing new tarballs
* Fri Aug 28 2009 Pravin Satpute <[email protected]> - 2.4.2
- added conf file for all fonts
- contributions from Parag Nemade <[email protected]> for conf files
* Wed Aug 12 2009 Pravin Satpute <[email protected]> - 2.4.1
- Update Copyright
* Tue Aug 04 2009 Pravin Satpute <[email protected]> - 2.4.0
- Added Unicode 5.1 support in All Lohit fonts
* Thu Mar 05 2009 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.3.8
- Bug 428427 - [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering
- Bug 450699 - [ta_IN]Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font (fixed in font, needs rendering update)
- Bug 476427 - [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font
- Bug 479100 - [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly
- Bug 483530 - [bn_IN]Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support
- Added Lohit-Assamese
- Modified README file.
* Tue Sep 09 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.3.1
- Bug 216400: [te_IN] - Anaconda GUI - Release Notes button is overlapping
with other texts in a specific page
* Wed Aug 20 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.3.0
- Bug 215902: [hi_IN, mr_IN]Incorrect extent of 0x093f when attached to a composite character which has width greater than a single character (hi_IN & maybe others)
- Forked Lohit Hindi into Marathi, Maithili, Kashmiri, Konkani, Sindhi and Nepali.
* Fri Jun 06 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]>
- Bug 445176: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph
* Fri Jun 06 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]>
- Improved Anchoring(blwm Anchor-0) for Hindi font.
- Corrected positioning of U+0953 for Hindi font.
* Tue Apr 29 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.2.1
- Resolved bugs (bugzilla.redhat.com):
- Bug 444559 Processed: [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30
(xRa) in a word
- Bug 444561 Processed: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to
form the pre based glyph
- Bug 444563: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by
0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
* Tue Apr 08 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.2.0
- Resolved bugs (bugzilla.redhat.com):
- Bug 202400: [hi_IN] New codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.0
- Bug 205981: [hi_IN]The font file of Devanagari(lohit_hi.ttf) lacks the glyph
of U+0x0904
- Bug 206426: [hi_IN, mr_IN] Some Glyphs are missing and some GPOS shapes
should be more perfect - Priority - C
- Bug 239630: [hi_IN] the glyph of 0x0953 in lohit_hi.ttf is wrong.
- Bug 428427: [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering
* Thu Feb 28 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.1.9
- Resolved bugs(bugzilla.redhat.com):
- Bug 431035: [ml_IN] Glyph to be formed for nine consonants + 0D4D + 0D32
- Bug 433437: [ml_IN] Rendering combination incorrect with 0D35
- Bug 433440: [ml_IN] Rendering combination incorrect with 0D2F
- Contributions from Hiran Venugopalan (xRa glyphs and few other)
* Fri Jan 25 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.1.8
- Bug 192812: [ml_IN]GPOS issues in new Malayalam font
- Bug 402321: [ml_IN} Wrong combinations used for the conjunct 'ന്പ'
- Bug 402331: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'ന്റ'
- Bug 424701: [ml_IN] words are shown joined (very low space shown on screen)
- Bug 429526: [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file
- Bug 247233: Additional special character rendering for assamese [as-IN] and bengali [bn-IN]
* Tue Jan 15 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.1.7
- Updated the makedist.sh script
* Tue Jan 15 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.1.7
- Bug 233419: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel are
not rendering correctly
* Fri Dec 14 2007 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.1.6
- Bug 234284: [pa_IN] Enlarge size for asterik(*)
* Mon Mar 26 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.5
- Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 231965: [kn_IN] wrong Conjuct combines during the formation kannada letter [yo]
- Bug 233257: [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0CAE with U0CCB is rendering wrongly
- Bug 233415: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel are not rendering correctly
- Bug 233554: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CC0 are not rendering correctly
- Bug 233555: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CC7 are not rendering correctly
- Bug 233556: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CC6 are not rendering correctly
- Bug 233557: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CC8 are not rendering correctly
- Bug 233558: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CCBare not rendering correctly
- Bug 233559: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CBE are not rendering correctly
- Bug 233560: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CBF are not rendering correctly
* Mon Mar 05 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.4
- Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 221383: [kn_IN] GSUB combinations has problem with Ra
* Mon Feb 19 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.3
- Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 202401: [ta_IN] New codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.0
- Bug 223774: [kn_IN] Some Ligature rules are wrong in the font file
- Bug 223971: [kn_IN] Consonant + Halant + Consonant + Dependent Vowel not appearing properly in some rare cases
- Bug 227971: [kn_IN] Combinations with 2 Halants not rendering properly
* Tue Jan 16 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.2
- Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 222407: [or_IN] [fonts-indic] - One GSUB Conjunct is not appearing with its correct shape
- Bug 206434: [ml_IN] Digits are appearing in English instead of malayalam - Priority C
- Bug 215894: Relative height of 0x0901 (and 0x0902) on 0x0915 is different than other devnagari characters (hi_IN, mr_IN)
- Bug 222408: [te_IN] [fonts-indic] - Danda and Double Danda to be implemented with 0964 && 0965
- Bug 222409: [kn_IN] [fonts-indic] - Danda and Double Danda to be implemented with 0964 && 0965
- Bug 221384: [kn_IN] - shape of ra (U+0CB0) is not corret in combined character (below base)
* Tue Jan 16 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.1
- Added makedist.sh, generate.sh and generate.pe script files.
* Fri Jan 12 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.13
- Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 220880: [or_IN] Danda need to move from 0B64/0B65 to 0964/0965
- Bug 222406: [ml_IN] Danda need to move from 0D64/0D65 to 0964/0965
* Wed Jan 02 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.12
- Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 220881: [ta_IN] [fonts-tamil] - Warning showing in the terminal when run apps with ta_IN locale
- Bug 220882: [hi_IN] rendering problem for number "5" in postscript file
* Wed Dec 13 2006 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.11
- Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 216639: [kn_IN] OTF rules to be fixed - Priority A
- Bug 217482: [kn_IN] - pango - Composed Char not rendered properly
- Bug 219583: [pa_IN] Punjabi fonts' size is big as compared to English
- Bug 218588: [gu_IN] Qt doesn't display virama properly
* Tue Dec 06 2006 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.10
- Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 207269: [ta_IN] - Some conjunct characters not appearing with proper shape - Priority - B
- Bug 217482: [kn_IN] - pango - Composed Char not rendered properly
- Bug 216628: [ml] characters are not shown bold during selecting BOLD font
- Bug 218588: [gu_IN] Qt doesn't display virama properly
- Bug 206599: [te_IN] - Some of the Priority - C GSUB Conjuncts are not appearing with its actual shape
- Resolved Bugs from LingNing Zhang
- Bug 218586: [ml_IN] 0d2f+0d4d combination is invaild when put in word
- Bug 218587: [ml_IN] 0d35+0d4d combination is invaild (should not combine)
* Tue Nov 21 2006 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.9
- Fixed Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 216060: [pa_IN]Lohit Punjabi: (U+0A03) Gurmukhi Sign Visarga right margin is too wide.
* Tue Nov 21 2006 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.8
- Fixed Bugs from Parag Nemade
- Bug 216629 : [te_IN] GPOS position should be at middle instead of left hand side - Priority B
- Bug 216631 : [or_IN] one GSUB Rule is wrongly defined - Priority A
- Bug 216628 : [ml] characters are not shown bold during selecting BOLD font
- Bug 216624 : [pa_IN] 0a01/0a03/0964/0965 is missing from font
- Bug 216634 : Glyphs for two combinations are wrong in Gujarati (gu_IN)
- Bug 197216 : [bn_IN]Incorrect glyph for conjunct
- Bug 215894 : Relative height of 0x0901 (and 0x0902) on 0x0915 is different than
other devnagari characters (hi_IN, mr_IN)
- Fixed Bugs from LingNing Zhang
- Bug 216626 : [as_IN] Pango - A particular char when Conjuncts, creates Cursor Nevigation Problem
- Bug 216627 : [ml_IN] The glyph of 0x25CC is not existing in lohit_ml.ttf
- Bug 216639 : [kn_IN] OTF rules to be fixed - Priority A
* Tue 17 oct 2006 Leon Ho <[email protected]> - 2.0.7
- Bug 206601: [ta_IN] Glyph is missing for Unicode U+0BB6 - Priority - A (Rahul Bhalerao)
- Bug 216639: [kn_IN] OTF rules to be fixed - Priority A (Ramakrishna Reddy)
* Fri 29 Sep 2006 Leon Ho <[email protected]> - 2.0.6
- Bug 208525: [ml_IN]the glyph of 0d33+0d4d+0d33 is wrong (LingNing Zhang)
- Bug 208540: [ml_IN]the glyph of 0d2f+0d4d and the glyph of 0d2f+0d4d+0d2f are wrong (LingNing Zhang)