You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The behavior at the bounds is different because of how the inputs (reserves) are overwritten to be just at the bounds. The tests should make sure the behavior stays consistent as we get closer and closer to the bounds and it does not jump. In issue #439, there was scenarios where the invariant "jumps" because of the invariant's bound behaviors, which leads to unexpected economic pricing in the pools.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related to #439
The behavior at the bounds is different because of how the inputs (reserves) are overwritten to be just at the bounds. The tests should make sure the behavior stays consistent as we get closer and closer to the bounds and it does not jump. In issue #439, there was scenarios where the invariant "jumps" because of the invariant's bound behaviors, which leads to unexpected economic pricing in the pools.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: