You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I apologize in advance if this question doesn't make sense as I'm still wrapping my brain around Vale/HACL*.
We would potentially like to use some of the cryptographic implementations from HACL* in the @RustCrypto project.
The ideal way for us to consume them would be using Rust inline assembly syntax, as this approach eliminates all platform-specific concerns around linking by passing assembly directly to LLVM.
I thought I'd at least inquire as to whether it would make sense for Vale to have first-class support for this in some form. We could potentially build our own tooling to do this, but if it makes sense as a first-class feature that seems like a much better solution to me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I apologize in advance if this question doesn't make sense as I'm still wrapping my brain around Vale/HACL*.
We would potentially like to use some of the cryptographic implementations from HACL* in the @RustCrypto project.
The ideal way for us to consume them would be using Rust inline assembly syntax, as this approach eliminates all platform-specific concerns around linking by passing assembly directly to LLVM.
I thought I'd at least inquire as to whether it would make sense for Vale to have first-class support for this in some form. We could potentially build our own tooling to do this, but if it makes sense as a first-class feature that seems like a much better solution to me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: