Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Research: Understand/propose potential integration or not with EMA Workbench #1630

Open
jackiekazil opened this issue Apr 13, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@jackiekazil
Copy link
Member

From this paper: https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2016/proceed/papers/P1311.pdf

From this large toolbox of Python modules mesa was used to implement the ABM (Masad and Kazil, 2015) and PySD (Houghton, and Siegel, 2015) was used for an simple conversion of a SD model implemented in Vensim ® into an equivalent equitation based model in Python. Furthermore, the complete architecture was embedded into the Python based Exploratory Modeling and Analysis (EMA) Workbench (Kwakkel and Pruyt, 2015). EMA is used to set up experiments and perform advanced result analysis.

This is EMA Workbench: https://pypi.org/project/ema-workbench/

I haven't had a chance to think about this. I am putting this in a ticket for my later self or for someone else to pick up.

Questions:

  • What is EMA Workbench?
  • How might it integrate with Mesa?
  • Is there value in endorsing or illustrating this in some way?
@EwoutH
Copy link
Member

EwoutH commented Sep 3, 2024

This might help with (a small part) of that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants