You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The challenge function can be front-run. This might be exploited by a challenger, who wants to grab the bounty of other challengers, or by the claimant itself, as a way to withdraw funds.
A challenge is not a surefire way to win a bounty as Kleros can rule against the challenge (the original challenger might be wrong, so the front-runner can lose money by attacking), but still, this attack possibility might be annoying and it's better if we patch.
One way to patch it is to introduce a commit and reveal scheme. Or we can ignore it because the attack does not look so promising, and as implementing a defense will be at the expense of a gas hike for regular usage, we can save gas by ignoring the attack.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The challenge function can be front-run. This might be exploited by a challenger, who wants to grab the bounty of other challengers, or by the claimant itself, as a way to withdraw funds.
A challenge is not a surefire way to win a bounty as Kleros can rule against the challenge (the original challenger might be wrong, so the front-runner can lose money by attacking), but still, this attack possibility might be annoying and it's better if we patch.
One way to patch it is to introduce a commit and reveal scheme. Or we can ignore it because the attack does not look so promising, and as implementing a defense will be at the expense of a gas hike for regular usage, we can save gas by ignoring the attack.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: