Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extrusion width parametr ignorened in generated gcode #13385

Open
2 tasks done
gabrkova opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done

Extrusion width parametr ignorened in generated gcode #13385

gabrkova opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@gabrkova
Copy link

Description of the bug

Tried to make first layer wider. Generated 2 gcode files from Prusa Slicer with different parametr of extrusion width for first layer (from 0,5 changed to 0,55).

image

Generated gcode files were the same, no wider first layer was in gcode.

Project file & How to reproduce

Model 5 Dil C.zip

  1. generate gcode file with parameter 0.5
  2. chang the value of parametr extrusion width for first layer
  3. generate gcode file with parameter 0.55
  4. comapre the 2 gcode files

Checklist of files included above

  • Project file
  • Screenshot

Version of PrusaSlicer

PrusaSlicer-2.8.0+win64-202406270929

Operating system

Windows 11 64 bit

Printer model

Prusa MINI+

@neophyl
Copy link

neophyl commented Sep 17, 2024

That is because you are using Arachne as the slicing choice. Arachne will dynamically adjust extrusion widths to suit itself. In effect you are giving up control to the algorithm. By the time its adjusted from the 2 starting defined widths what it decides to use basically becomes the same. I tried 0.6 width and its the same. I had to go to 0.7 to start seeing differences.

If you change the slicing to Classic and do your 2 exports with different extrusion widths and do a compare you will see differences on the first layer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants