-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Allow queued voluntary exits #14448
Comments
hmm are you sure you are not just requesting it on an account too early? you are exiting before the node thinks it's on the exit epoch |
I just executed the command I mentioned above, and the logic should have been implemented internally by prysm, so I think it's an internal bug
|
We don't have queueing your request as a feature in prysm, you're probably just executing the command too early, you need to wait till the beacon chain is at or after the epoch to run the exit |
Updated the title to reflect that a possible resolution to this issue would be to add some kind of pool to the beacon node to hold local voluntary exits and only publish them when they become valid. |
Thank you very much for your attention to my question. |
Describe the bug
I'm having the
expected current epoch >= exit epoch
problem when I run this command, this is an occasional occurrence and the probability of it happening is not high, I use this command a lot due to my development needs, I've encountered this problem maybe 2 times in the past year of development and when it occurs, it stays with this error for 1 Even if I re-execute the command, it still has the error, and the problem does not return to normal until the next epoch.For this reason I read the relevant part of the code and found the error in this location, I think it is signed the wrong epoch, the exact cause of the error I don't know yet, but I would like to report this, I would be very grateful if you could locate this problem and fix it, because I use this code a lot.
Has this worked before in a previous version?
🔬 Minimal Reproduction
The exact cause of the bug I don't know yet, but I would like to report this, I would be very grateful if you could locate this problem and fix it, because I use this code a lot.
Error
Platform(s)
Linux (x86)
What version of Prysm are you running? (Which release)
v5.0.3
Anything else relevant (validator index / public key)?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: