-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Identify Base Dewey Call Numbers #318
Comments
@ruthtillman only 4 catkeys out of our sample had dewey call numbers:
|
Got it! I can work from these, but it would be helpful to have a slightly bigger one if possible. @mkutch do you know if you can do an export of 500 records which include a 949w == DEWEY? (and update -- I put a table of expectations in the top, but it'll help to have more) |
@ruthtillman there is more in this dewey_more.txt, just to note the sample I used is not from an up-to-date extract but thought it would be good enough to give an idea. there is no cutting done on the dewey numbers |
@banukutlu perfect! They don't need to be 100% current, call numbers rarely change |
@ruthtillman Could you please review these results? dewey_lopped.txt |
@ruthtillman I emailed you the sample requested. |
Only a few issues identified:
|
Also of note: per testing on Adam's browse, the "t.\d" thing also affects LC, so we should apply whatever fix works here to that regex as well. |
@ruthtillman sample results with |
t. lopping looks good! |
To-Do
call_number_dewey_ssm
fieldExamples
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: