You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@divyabaid16 I wanted to see if you'd like to give this a try, building on the amazing work @sashadev-sky and others have done to make the cloud export function work.
In https://mapknitter.org/maps/pvdtest/, try holding shift, then dragging from lower right to upper left, and you should see images get selected. Then you should see a down arrow button appear in upper left; if you click it, it'll start an export process, but with no feedback to the user. See #782 for how this is hooked up!
Can we display the ongoing export in the client side in just JavaScript, using the same progress bar UI we have for in-app exports?
I think this may take some mockups, but since we can now make multiple exports at once (using cloud export) we could start to show exports in a list in the exports tab, instead of just having one at a time. Then each could have a set of downloads that it offers.
What do you all think of this? Thinking in coordination with #659#693#526
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@divyabaid16 I wanted to see if you'd like to give this a try, building on the amazing work @sashadev-sky and others have done to make the cloud export function work.
In https://mapknitter.org/maps/pvdtest/, try holding shift, then dragging from lower right to upper left, and you should see images get selected. Then you should see a down arrow button appear in upper left; if you click it, it'll start an export process, but with no feedback to the user. See #782 for how this is hooked up!
Can we display the ongoing export in the client side in just JavaScript, using the same progress bar UI we have for in-app exports?
I think this may take some mockups, but since we can now make multiple exports at once (using cloud export) we could start to show exports in a list in the exports tab, instead of just having one at a time. Then each could have a set of downloads that it offers.
What do you all think of this? Thinking in coordination with #659 #693 #526
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: