Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backtracking and overhaul of geometry calculations #47

Open
AdamRJensen opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Backtracking and overhaul of geometry calculations #47

AdamRJensen opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@AdamRJensen
Copy link
Member

AdamRJensen commented Mar 11, 2024

In a potential upcoming project, we've been asked to develop a backtracking strategy for two-axis trackers.

However, the twoaxistracking package has been developed on the simplifying assumption that all trackers are normal to the sun, which significantly simplifies the geometrical calculations.

If this project is granted, the geometry calculations will be overhauled to allow for trackers that are not normal to the sun. My initial idea is to add two additional arguments in order to be able to specify tracker position (surface_elevation and surface_azimuth). These two parameters could be optional, and when not specified default to true tracking, i.e., normal to the sun.

twoaxistracking.shaded_fraction(solar_elevation, solar_azimuth, surface_elevation, surface_azimuth, ...

The underlying code needs a major modification, where I'm imagining that the collector geometry has to be projected into the coordinate system normal to the sun.

Edit October 2024. It is unlikely to be added at the moment.

@AdamRJensen AdamRJensen changed the title Backtracking and overhaul of geometry handling Backtracking and overhaul of geometry calculations Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant