Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Creating an analysis with GG2 tables #3393

Open
wasade opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Creating an analysis with GG2 tables #3393

wasade opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@wasade
Copy link
Contributor

wasade commented Apr 17, 2024

I created an analysis with a GG2 filtered table, and was surprised to see it described as a Greengenes 13_8 table.

Is a user able to select artifacts that are GG2 filtered for analysis?

Screen Shot 2024-04-17 at 9 01 51 AM
@antgonza
Copy link
Member

The Merging Scheme is: "parent command | grand parent command" and for those artifacts:

  • parent is filter features from the gg2 plugin
  • grandparent is Deblur 2021.09 filtered against GG13.8 as you are using the reference-hit tables

Thus, is accurate. A way to "solve" this would be to rename the commands in GG2 to reflect that, like: "Filter features against GG2 reference".

@wasade
Copy link
Contributor Author

wasade commented Apr 17, 2024

Thanks! It should note the version of GG2 as well. Should this be upstream of the merging scheme though, and part of the artifact information?

@antgonza
Copy link
Member

That's right. Note that all the names are inherited from the original commands (in this case the GG2 Q2 plugin) so the changes need to happen there not in Qiita.

@wasade
Copy link
Contributor Author

wasade commented Apr 17, 2024

How does this differ conceptually from representing how the GG 13_8 database is described as used? Qiita defines and creates artifact information, right?

If this does not need to change in Qiita, do you know what needs to change and where?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants