-
I forgot about this, should we do like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 27 replies
-
Do you mean, should we make it a static library or a dynamic library, as discussed in this stackoverflow question. I'm in favor of making it dynamic library. It's probably harder to pack, but we can make fixes to the library (e.g. to the dbusmenu part) without having to rebuild all apps that use it. Also it avoids (some) license clashes. For example I'm unsure what the legal status of a static LGPL-2 library in a MIT licensed application (QasMixer) is. It's all open source, so I'm not too worried, but I know that Debians legal people care about this stuff. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I think it doesn't matter if we bundle or link
libdbusmenu-qtilities
since we don't make it's interface public inlibstatusnotifieritem
. The only method/symbol that must stay unchanged isStatusNotifierItem::setContextMenu
.That's the only Menu related method/symbol that we export.