Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to handle .sig #769

Closed
zen0bit opened this issue Sep 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

How to handle .sig #769

zen0bit opened this issue Sep 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zen0bit
Copy link
Contributor

zen0bit commented Sep 17, 2023

For example:

Guix GNU Linux #768 comes with qcow2 files which are signed.

.sig files are provided, but not any shsums.

How to check qcow2/ISO files against .sig

@zen0bit
Copy link
Contributor Author

zen0bit commented Sep 22, 2023

wget 'https://sv.gnu.org/people/viewgpg.php?user_id=15145' -qO - | gpg --import -
gpg: key 090B11993D9AEBB5: 127 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: /home/zen/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key 090B11993D9AEBB5: public key "Ludovic Courtès [email protected]" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found

gpg --verify guix-system-vm-image-1.4.0.x86_64-linux.qcow2.sig
gpg: assuming signed data in 'guix-system-vm-image-1.4.0.x86_64-linux.qcow2'
gpg: Signature made Sun 18 Dec 2022 10:09:33 PM CET
gpg: using RSA key 3CE464558A84FDC69DB40CFB090B11993D9AEBB5
gpg: Good signature from "Ludovic Courtès [email protected]" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Ludovic Courtès [email protected]" [unknown]
gpg: aka "Ludovic Courtès (Inria) [email protected]" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5

@flexiondotorg flexiondotorg added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 19, 2023
@quickemu-project quickemu-project locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 10, 2023
@flexiondotorg flexiondotorg converted this issue into discussion #838 Nov 10, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants