Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing data #44

Open
Tracked by #94
malcolmbarrett opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 12 comments
Open
Tracked by #94

Missing data #44

malcolmbarrett opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 12 comments

Comments

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator

malcolmbarrett commented Jun 28, 2022

Lucy's slides
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sim.8355:

Results indicated that the Within approach produced unbiased estimates with appropriate confidence intervals, whereas the Across approach produced biased results and unrealistic confidence intervals

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

it seems like null effect vs non-null effect might be relevant, perhaps by changing the dag

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

malcolmbarrett commented Apr 28, 2023

Imputation of some sort allows you to calculate a marginal ATE instead of using a conditional with the predictors of y

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

More notes after Lucy's in-depth analysis of this problem. We'll use her writing as a basis for this but a few big picture ideas:

  • Stochastic (single imputation, norm.predict in mice) without Y works because the ratio of the covariance and variance is correct
  • Full on MICE with Y also works but is more complex
  • Ignorable vs nonignorable for causal. Does it induce confounding bias? Dags useful here
  • If ignorable, imputation can improve precision because it increases N but model mentioned above does add variance, too, so it's kind of a wash. A little improvement

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

callout box for why we're not using terms MAR, MNCAR, etc. Not clear if talking about causal mechanism or missingness mechanism

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Benefit of full MICE: CAN recover correct SE to true value

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

MB Question: does propensity score model fitted with variables from deterministic model without Y need any different approaches?

Lucy doesn't think so but will investigate

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

exclusion criteria + missingness: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.9685

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

malcolmbarrett commented Sep 11, 2023

checks for partially missing covariates: https://janickweberpals.gitlab-pages.partners.org/smdi/articles/smdi.html
course materials from a class on causal effects and missingness: Missing Data Theory and Causal Effects

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@malcolmbarrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant