Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make x-r-whatever-style hyperlinks configurable #739

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Nov 9, 2024

Conversation

jennybc
Copy link
Member

@jennybc jennybc commented Oct 31, 2024

Relates to posit-dev/positron#5231

This is about making cli hyperlinks work when positron-r carries out package dev tasks, such as devtools::test() in an integrated terminal. An extension can contribute a URI handler, but only URIs with a very specific format are routed into the handler.

@gaborcsardi
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me'

@jennybc jennybc changed the title Make .run hyperlinks configurable Make x-r-whatever-style hyperlinks configurable Nov 2, 2024
Comment on lines +435 to +446
get_config_chr <- function(x, default = NULL) {
opt <- getOption(paste0("cli.", tolower(x)))
if (!is.null(opt)) {
stopifnot(is_string(opt))
return(opt)
}

env <- Sys.getenv(paste0("R_CLI_", toupper(x)), NA_character_)
if (!is.na(env)) return(env)

default
}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For everything I've touched, configuration is possible:

  • Via an option or an env var. Context: in the Positron R console, options are easier for us (or at least that was true at some earlier point? but I have no reason to believe anything has changed). However, for R package dev tasks that run in a separate R process in an integrated terminal, env vars work much better.
  • The option is consulted first. There was precedent for this.

vignettes/cli-config-user.Rmd Show resolved Hide resolved
vignettes/cli-config-user.Rmd Show resolved Hide resolved
vignettes/cli-config-user.Rmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
positron://positron.positron-r/cli?command=x-r-run:{code}
```

(For backwards compatibility with older versions of RStudio, in some contexts, a legacy format is used, e.g. `ide:run:{code}`.)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do I have this right?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure what you mean. Don't we always use ide::run in RStudio?

Copy link
Member Author

@jennybc jennybc Nov 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we always use ide::run in RStudio?

I am finding it hard to actually figure this out. The RStudio detection logic is pretty complicated.

I thought there was some plan to start using the x-r-* format in RStudio as well and to phase out the legacy format.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I'm thinking of this:

rstudio/rstudio#12084

rstudio/rstudio#12096

@jennybc jennybc marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2024 00:41
@jennybc
Copy link
Member Author

jennybc commented Nov 8, 2024

OK @gaborcsardi this has been promoted to a real PR now. Will you re-review? I think it's close.

@gaborcsardi
Copy link
Member

Do I understand it correctly that you are going to set the env vars to turn on hyperlinks in Positron tests? If yes, then is it going to cause problems that the env vars will be inherited in subprocesses, and those will also produce hyperlinks? E.g. if a test case knits an Rmd file, that'll potentially have ANSI escapes in the output?

Copy link
Member

@gaborcsardi gaborcsardi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! The tests pass, so I am fine with this. :)

@jennybc
Copy link
Member Author

jennybc commented Nov 8, 2024

Do I understand it correctly that you are going to set the env vars to turn on hyperlinks in Positron tests? If yes, then is it going to cause problems that the env vars will be inherited in subprocesses, and those will also produce hyperlinks? E.g. if a test case knits an Rmd file, that'll potentially have ANSI escapes in the output?

Yes, I intend to set these env vars when Positron runs tests in a separate R process, i.e. not in the R console. So this would apply to the command "R: Test R Package", which runs devtools::test() and is typically hooked up to Ctrl/Cmd + Shift + T. The goal is to make the usual testthat affordances like testthat::snapshot_accept() and testthat::snapshot_review() work (be clickable). (File hyperlinks will be handled in a separate PR.)

Is it going to cause problems? Well, I think the problems are solvable if it does and are problems worth solving. I.e. it's a matter of test hygiene.

cli itself passes its own tests, with this PR, with Positron's "R: Test R Package" command. And I assume that cli is the package most likely to experience problems.

I did have to add local_clean_cli_context() to 1 test:

local_clean_cli_context()

And this issue is why the new options/env vars have been added to test_that_cli() and local_clean_cli_context(). So the tools are in place for people ensure a "plain vanilla" environment for a test.

@jennybc
Copy link
Member Author

jennybc commented Nov 8, 2024

I just re-verified that cli passes its own tests, installed from this PR, inside a dev build of Positron, in which I'm setting these new env vars to make x-r-* hyperlinks functional in package dev tasks.

But there's one worth discussing:

R_CLI_HYPERLINK_MODE: "posix"

I wanted to set this to "posix", but that really does cause massive test failure, so I backed off.

The OSC 8 hyperlink "spec" says that ESC \ is the preferred string terminator (which is what "posix" produces here), but that BEL (or \a) is another, less preferred variant. Do you have any interest in moving that direction? I guess it really doesn't matter as long as VS Code / Positron continues to support BEL, which it currently does.

@gaborcsardi
Copy link
Member

If you are fine with BEL, I don't really mind.

@jennybc
Copy link
Member Author

jennybc commented Nov 9, 2024

I think this can be merged, but I've identified one problem:

If an expect_snapshot() fails inside test_that_cli(), the hyperlink format is not being taken from the environment in which devtools::test() is being run. Instead, it seems to come from the environment inside the test. In practical terms, it means the advice to run testthat::snapshot_review() is not (yet) a clickable hyperlink for this special case.

I'm struggling to understand why this happens, given that such hyperlinks do appear even when test_that_cli(links = "none"). I.e. hyperlinks can be disabled inside a test, but a failure still leads to a hyperlink (it's just got the wrong format).

If you don't immediately see whatever it is that I'm missing, I propose we merge this so I can move forward in Positron. Then we can return to the matter, once you can see exactly what I'm talking about using a daily build.

@gaborcsardi gaborcsardi merged commit 169949c into main Nov 9, 2024
13 checks passed
@jennybc jennybc deleted the positron-arms-length-task branch November 11, 2024 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants