You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We've got Ctrl/Cmd + Shift + B in Positron wired up to pak::local_install(upgrade = FALSE) right now, so I'm using it alot and have had ample time to stare at its messaging. I would really like to keep using pak for this or at least make it one of two pre-configured options (see further discussion at posit-dev/positron#2955), because I really like what upgrade = FALSE does (more background in posit-dev/positron#1631 and posit-dev/positron#1732).
> pak::local_install(upgrade = FALSE)
✔ Updated metadata database: 4.28 MB in 4 files.
✔ Updating metadata database ... done
→ Will update 1 package.
→ The package (0 B) is cached.
+ usethis 2.2.3.9000 → 2.2.3.9000 👷🏿♂️
ℹ No downloads are needed, 1 pkg is cached
✔ Got usethis 2.2.3.9000 (source) (96 B)
ℹ Packaging usethis 2.2.3.9000
✔ Packaged usethis 2.2.3.9000 (4.2s)
ℹ Building usethis 2.2.3.9000
✔ Built usethis 2.2.3.9000 (2.6s)
✔ Installed usethis 2.2.3.9000 (local) (44ms)
✔ 1 pkg + 30 deps: kept 28, upd 1, dld 1 (NA B) [20.6s]
A few aspects of this seem weird to me, given that I'm installing from local source.
ℹ No downloads are needed, 1 pkg is cached
Somehow this makes me feel like pak is going to use some previously-downloaded-and-cached version of usethis, instead of local source. I do understand that is not what's happening, but the message has made me think about it.
✔ 1 pkg + 30 deps: kept 28, upd 1, dld 1 (NA B) [20.6s]
This line also seems a bit misleading. I assume usethis is the "1 pkg" and not considered part of the "30 deps". But then ... is it the 1 package that was ?updated? and ?downloaded? in the "kept 28, upd 1, dld 1" part 🤔
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We've got Ctrl/Cmd + Shift + B in Positron wired up to
pak::local_install(upgrade = FALSE)
right now, so I'm using it alot and have had ample time to stare at its messaging. I would really like to keep using pak for this or at least make it one of two pre-configured options (see further discussion at posit-dev/positron#2955), because I really like whatupgrade = FALSE
does (more background in posit-dev/positron#1631 and posit-dev/positron#1732).A few aspects of this seem weird to me, given that I'm installing from local source.
Somehow this makes me feel like pak is going to use some previously-downloaded-and-cached version of usethis, instead of local source. I do understand that is not what's happening, but the message has made me think about it.
This line also seems a bit misleading. I assume usethis is the "1 pkg" and not considered part of the "30 deps". But then ... is it the 1 package that was ?updated? and ?downloaded? in the "kept 28, upd 1, dld 1" part 🤔
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: