-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
/
aga_dmo.m
43 lines (37 loc) · 1.49 KB
/
aga_dmo.m
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
%% Agarwal et al. solution in the aquifer
% This is a demo of the interpretation of an intereference pumping test
% with the Agarwal (1970) solution (skin + well capacity).
%
% MIT License
% Copyright (c) 2017 Philippe Renard - University of Neuchâtel (CHYN)
%% Load the data
% The data for this example has been typed from:
% HALL P., CHEN J., 1996. Water well and aquifer test analysis.
% Water Resources Publications, LLC, 412 pp.
% The test data are published on page 171-174. and interpreted with the
% Papadopulos-Cooper model with 2 differents storativities.
%
% Let us first load the data.
[t,s]=ldf('pca_ds1.dat');
rw=0.6096; % Radius of the well in m
rc=0.6096; % Radius of the casing in m
r=3.048; % Radial distance in m
Q=0.0050464; % Pumping rate m3/s
aga_pre(rw,rc,r,Q);
%% Interpretation
% We can then fit the model. It happens that it is not possible to get a
% good automatic fit or manual fit to the data with the Agarwal model.
% We keep only the manual fit which is based on the late time data
% for the transmissivity. We find:
% T = 8.8 e-4 m2/s, S = 6.7 e-4, sigma=-0.7
p0=aga_gss(t,s);
p=fit('aga',p0,t,s);
p=[1.1,8,-0.7];
aga_rpt(p,t,s,'Hall & Chen example - Automatic fit');
%%
% For comparison, the results found by Hall and Chen using the
% Papadopulos-Cooper (1967) model using two different storativities is :
% alpha = 0.002 which is equivalent to Cd = 1000
% T = 7.97e-04 m2/s
% S1 = 3.49e-03
% S2 = 2.00e-03