We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Right now, one can do something along the lines of
D_local = LegendreDerivativeOperator(-1.0, 1.0, 3) # 4 nodes = polynomial degree 3 mesh = UniformPeriodicMesh1D(; xmin, xmax, Nx = 2^5) D1 = PeriodicUpwindOperators( couple_discontinuously(D_local, mesh, Val(:minus)), couple_discontinuously(D_local, mesh, Val(:central)), couple_discontinuously(D_local, mesh, Val(:plus)) )
However, it would be nice to have a better API based on upwind_operators, e.g., something like
upwind_operators
D1 = upwind_operators(D_local, mesh)
The basic question is whether this is the best option or whether passing something like couple_discontinuously would be better.
couple_discontinuously
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Right now, one can do something along the lines of
However, it would be nice to have a better API based on
upwind_operators
, e.g., something likeThe basic question is whether this is the best option or whether passing something like
couple_discontinuously
would be better.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: