Proposing some Issue / PR / Discussion label modifications

[remrama]

I'm considering some updates to the labels that the YASA repository uses for Issues, PRs, and Discussions and would like some community feedback first. cc @raphaelvallat

1. Add a docs or documentation label with a short description like: Related to online documentation. Right now docs-related Issues typically get tagged with enhancement, but this would be a useful distinction. Most changes to documentation are small and easily clumped together, so when working on docs it'd be nice to filter by this label.

2. Remove the duplicate label. As of last month, Issues/PRs/Discussions can be "Closed as duplicate". (This hasn't been used yet in YASA anyways.)

3. Update the help wanted label description. If I understand this label, it's a casual request or offer for assistance from a new developer (something akin to a good first issue label). I like this idea a lot but the description should be updated to match that if so; maybe something like Good first issue for newcomers, Looking for assistance, or just changing the current to Extra attention assistance is needed.

4. Remove the invalid label or clarify it's purpose in the description. Is this separate from bug? I think it could be removed, but if I'm missing a strong reason to keep it I think we should reword its single-sentence description for clarity. Maybe invalid is like a minor bug? If so, I think we already have that case covered since there is both bug and urgent (so a bug without an associated urgent implies a minor bug).

5. Remove the question label and emphasize the Q&A Discussions. By far my most controversial take lol. But I've always thought that facing the "where do I post" question on any GitHub repo with both Issues and Discussions can be rough, and having a "questions" in YASA Issues and "Q&A" in YASA Discussions probably doesn't help. But more importantly, I think that the nature of YASA brings along many newcomer questions about more general sleep-science things, like how the detection algorithms work and such, and that the Discussions are a better place for those questions to linger. These aren't really "Issues" in the technical sense since they don't relate to codebase changes, but I do think the YASA repo is a great place to ask them! I think they would be better placed in the Discussion section because (a) the "marked as answered" feature is nice, (b) they don't clutter up Issues, which feel more pressing to developers, and (c) they can linger much longer in Discussions for others to view. We could be clearer in the FAQ docs about where to post based.

[raphaelvallat]

Thank you @remrama for thinking this through! Some feedback:

1. ✅
2. ✅
3. I would just remove the help wanted label
4. ✅
5. Fully agree, great suggestion

[remrama]

Cool, I'll make these changes. Thanks for the feedback.

Btw I might convert some of the hanging question Issues to Discussions before removing that label.

[Vlada3333]

Thanks for the information!