Change div_int_frac methods to be suffixed by the number of bits of fraction e.g. div_int_frac8 #1926
Conversation
…act; e.g. div_int_frac8
…le future h/w change regresions
…uint32_t for future proofing
| // PICO_CONFIG: CYW43_PIO_CLOCK_DIV_FRAC, Fractional part of the clock divider for communication with the wireless chip, type=bool, default=0, group=pico_cyw43_driver | ||
| #ifndef CYW43_PIO_CLOCK_DIV_FRAC | ||
| #define CYW43_PIO_CLOCK_DIV_FRAC 0 | ||
| // PICO_CONFIG: CYW43_PIO_CLOCK_DIV_FRAC8, Fractional part of the clock divider for communication with the wireless chip 0-255, type=bool, default=0, group=pico_cyw43_driver |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we're renaming the PICO_CONFIG: entry from CYW43_PIO_CLOCK_DIV_FRAC to CYW43_PIO_CLOCK_DIV_FRAC8, we probably ought to do the same for the PICO_CMAKE_CONFIG: entry at https://github.com/raspberrypi/pico-sdk/blob/develop/src/rp2_common/pico_cyw43_driver/CMakeLists.txt#L87-L90
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good catch; @peterharperuk since this value was new post SDK2.0 I'm not going to support the old value
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok, I doubt there's much use for it anyway
There was a problem hiding this comment.
presumably much use OF it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, there's unlikely to be much need for changing the cyw43 pio divider by anything but a whole number.
| @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ void cyw43_driver_deinit(struct async_context *context); | |||
| #define CYW43_PIO_CLOCK_DIV_DYNAMIC 0 | |||
| #endif | |||
|
|
|||
| // PICO_CONFIG: CYW43_PIO_CLOCK_DIV_INT, Integer part of the clock divider for communication with the wireless chip, type=bool, default=2, group=pico_cyw43_driver | |||
| // PICO_CONFIG: CYW43_PIO_CLOCK_DIV_INT, Integer part of the clock divider for communication with the wireless chip, type=int, default=2, group=pico_cyw43_driver | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LOL, how on earth did I miss this?? 🤣
fixes #1924