OpenJDK 13 requires -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods flag #33

juergenzimmermann · 2019-06-02T11:15:39Z

OpenJDK 12.0.1 with even Kotlin 1.3.40-eap-67 works fine. However, using OpenJDK 13 build 23 I get the following exception:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: class redefinition failed: attempted to add a method
        at reactor.blockhound.BlockHound$Builder.install(BlockHound.java:264)
        at reactor.blockhound.BlockHound.install(BlockHound.java:64)
        at de.hska.kunde.ApplicationKt.main(Application.kt:51)
Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: class redefinition failed: attempted to add a method
        at java.instrument/sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.retransformClasses0(Native Method)
        at java.instrument/sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.retransformClasses(InstrumentationImpl.java:167)
        at reactor.blockhound.BlockHound$Builder.instrument(BlockHound.java:273)
        at reactor.blockhound.BlockHound$Builder.install(BlockHound.java:261)
        ... 2 more

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

bsideup · 2019-06-02T11:20:03Z

Hi @juergenzimmermann,

I'm afraid that's due to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8192936 and similar to #21
In JDK 13+, they adjusted the spec & impl and no longer allow redefining native methods :(

We will need to find an alternative way for 13+ and J9, meanwhile, they seem to plan adding a flag to keep the behaviour for a few versions:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8192936?focusedCommentId=14254266&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14254266

juergenzimmermann · 2019-06-02T16:54:37Z

@bsideup When I use -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods the stacktrace goes away

bsideup · 2019-06-02T18:47:32Z

@juergenzimmermann thanks a lot for trying it!
I will keep this issue open as a reminder to document this flag 👍

yburkouski · 2019-11-09T14:15:13Z

Heaving quite different behavior on Oracle JDK 13 in Windows: it does not throw an error about blocking call until I add this flag

Since OpenJDK requires `-XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethod` (see #33) starting with Java 13, we should test that the instrumentation was applied correctly and fail fast if not.

sergey-morenets · 2020-05-10T17:12:19Z

Still reproduced with JDK 14.0.1 and BlockHound 1.0.3

jaschenk · 2020-07-30T17:45:49Z

Using Blockhound 1.0.4 and JDK 14.0.2 and specify the following in surefire plugin worked:

<plugins>
 ...
         <plugin>
             <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
             <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
             <version>2.22.2</version>
             <configuration>
                 <argLine>-XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods</argLine>
             </configuration>
         </plugin>
 ...
 </plugins>

abdullahumer · 2020-11-29T19:12:13Z

any way this can be added to gradle?

bsideup · 2020-11-30T12:16:10Z

@abdullahumer sure:

    tasks.withType(Test).all {
        if (JavaVersion.current().isCompatibleWith(JavaVersion.VERSION_13)) {
            jvmArgs += [
                    "-XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods"
            ]
        }
    }

abdullahumer · 2020-12-01T09:25:37Z

Thanks! @bsideup

Removed due to issues with OpenJDK version 13+ reactor/BlockHound#33

roimenashe · 2021-08-25T13:06:06Z

Still reproduced with JDK 15.0.2 and BlockHound 1.0.6.RELEASE.
"-XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods" option still shows deprecation warning.
Any updates?

The dependency is not needed anymore and there is a issue when using OpenJDK 13 or higher reactor/BlockHound#33 Issue spring-projectsgh-10343

The dependency is not needed anymore and there is a issue when using OpenJDK 13 or higher reactor/BlockHound#33 Issue gh-10343

The dependency is not needed anymore and there is a issue when using OpenJDK 13 or higher reactor/BlockHound#33 Issue spring-projectsgh-10343

Prior to this commit, our BlockHound integration tests were disabled after the migration to a JDK 17 baseline since the build now always runs on JDK 14 or higher. To re-enable the tests we now supply the deprecated -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods command-line argument to the JVM for tests in the Gradle build. Users can also configure this manually within an IDE to run SpringCoreBlockHoundIntegrationTests. If that command-line argument is removed from the JVM at some point in the future, we will need to investigate an alternative solution. See reactor/BlockHound#33 for details.

CodeGTDLearn · 2022-02-17T18:18:51Z

Using Blockhound 1.0.4 and JDK 14.0.2 and specify the following in surefire plugin worked:

<plugins>
 ...
         <plugin>
             <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
             <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
             <version>2.22.2</version>
             <configuration>
                 <argLine>-XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods</argLine>
             </configuration>
         </plugin>
 ...
 </plugins>

In my case Using Blockhound 1.0.6 and JDK 15.0.6, worked

KrzysztofKwiatkowskiK · 2022-02-24T13:13:57Z

Using blockhound 1.0.6 and JDK 16.0.2 I am still getting this error and has to use the flag...

ajax-semenov-y · 2022-09-17T13:19:17Z

Hi. As far as I understand, according to https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8221528.

"This option (AllowRedefinitionToAddOrDeleteMethods) is deprecated right away. The plan is to keep it for a couple of releases to allow customers (tool vendors) to remove dependency on old behavior from their tools."

Do you plan BlockHound work according to the new JVM TI behavior?

juliojgd · 2022-12-19T10:59:57Z

I guess that if this issue is not solved, when the option AllowRedefinitionToAddOrDeleteMethods is removed from JVM, then Blockhound is completely unusable, right?

patpatpat123 · 2023-05-15T06:59:10Z

Now in 2023, almost four years after the original issue, would it be possible to have a fix without the -XX workaround please?

pderop · 2023-05-15T07:44:42Z

I will take a look, but I don't promise anything for the moment, because looking at the history of this issue, without the work around flag, it seems to be a very very big deal to redefine / retransform classes (add/delete private static and private final instance methods in the new class versions).
so, I'm afraid that for the moment, we need to continue using -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods for JDK13+
Is there any issues if you continue using this flag for the moment ?

thanks.

divyanshsaini1805 · 2023-10-17T07:45:36Z

i am using Java 17 and Spring 3.1.3, even after including the -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods flag, i am still facing the error. Is the flag removed from JVM or has the fix stopped working?

pderop · 2023-10-19T15:18:32Z

Hi @divyanshsaini1805 ,

please open a separate issue with a reproducer project;
From my side, I did the following which worked for me using Spring 3.1.3, and java 17:

build.gradle:

plugins {
    id 'java'
    id 'org.springframework.boot' version '3.1.3'
    id 'io.spring.dependency-management' version '1.1.3'
}

apply plugin: 'application'

group = 'com.example'
version = '0.0.1-SNAPSHOT'

java {
    sourceCompatibility = '17'
}

repositories {
    mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
    implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter'
    implementation 'io.projectreactor.netty:reactor-netty-core:1.0.37'
    implementation 'io.projectreactor.netty:reactor-netty-http:1.0.37'
    implementation('io.projectreactor.tools:blockhound:1.0.8.RELEASE')
    implementation 'javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api:1.3.2'
    testImplementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-test'
}

tasks.named('test') {
    useJUnitPlatform()
}

task(echoServer, dependsOn: 'classes', type: JavaExec) {
    main = 'com.example.EchoServer'
    classpath = sourceSets.main.runtimeClasspath
    args ''
    systemProperty "io.netty.leakDetectionLevel", "DISABLED"
    debugOptions {
        enabled = false
        port = 5005
        server = true
        suspend = true
    }
}

DemoApplication.java:

package com.example.demo;

import org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication;
import org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.SpringBootApplication;

@SpringBootApplication
public class DemoApplication {
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		SpringApplication.run(DemoApplication.class, args);
	}
}

Demo.java:

package com.example.demo;

import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import reactor.blockhound.BlockHound;
import reactor.netty.tcp.TcpServer;

import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;

@Component
public class Demo {
    static final int PORT = Integer.parseInt(System.getProperty("port", "8080"));

    @PostConstruct
    public void init() {
        System.out.println("Jdk version used: " + System.getProperty("java.version"));
        BlockHound.install();

        TcpServer server =
                TcpServer.create()
                        .port(PORT)
                        .handle((in, out) -> {
                            try {
                                Thread.sleep(100);
                            } catch (Throwable err) {
                                err.printStackTrace();
                            }
                            return out.send(in.receive().retain());
                        });

        server.bindNow()
                .onDispose()
                .block();
    }
}

then, from one console using java17:

./gradlew build
java -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods -jar build/libs/demo-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar

from another console:

curl -v http://localhost:8080/foo

this will display the following from the first console:

reactor.blockhound.BlockingOperationError: Blocking call! java.lang.Thread.sleep
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.sleep(Thread.java)
	at com.example.demo.Demo.lambda$init$0(Demo.java:34)
	at reactor.netty.tcp.TcpServer$OnConnectionHandle.accept(TcpServer.java:277)
	at reactor.netty.tcp.TcpServer$OnConnectionHandle.accept(TcpServer.java:264)
	at reactor.netty.transport.ServerTransportConfig$ServerTransportDoOnConnection.onStateChange(ServerTransportConfig.java:253)
	at reactor.netty.transport.ServerTransport$ChildObserver.onStateChange(ServerTransport.java:481)
	at reactor.netty.channel.ChannelOperationsHandler.channelActive(ChannelOperationsHandler.java:62)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:262)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:238)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:231)
	at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$HeadContext.channelActive(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:1398)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:258)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:238)
	at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.fireChannelActive(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:895)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel$AbstractUnsafe.register0(AbstractChannel.java:522)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel$AbstractUnsafe.access$200(AbstractChannel.java:429)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel$AbstractUnsafe$1.run(AbstractChannel.java:486)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.runTask(AbstractEventExecutor.java:174)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.safeExecute(AbstractEventExecutor.java:167)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor.runAllTasks(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:470)
	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:569)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:997)
	at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

Thanks.

apferrarone · 2024-01-12T07:12:44Z

I have tried on windows with corretto-17 and temurin-17. When I add the vm option to the Surefire plugin config in pom.xml, my unit tests work with BlockHound. But when I add the vm option to my IntelliJ run configuration or in the vm options file I still see this error when I start up my springboot app:

OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Sharing is only supported for boot loader classes because bootstrap classpath has been appended
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: The instrumentation have failed.
It looks like you're running on JDK 13+.
You need to add '-XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods' JVM flag.

public static void main(String[] args) {
	System.out.println(args[0] + " ");
	SpringApplication.run(BillGenerationServiceApplication.class, args);
}

I see this: -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods at the top of the console.

Any ideas? Thanks.

divyanshsaini1805 · 2024-01-16T10:10:44Z

Hi @divyanshsaini1805 ,

please open a separate issue with a reproducer project; From my side, I did the following which worked for me using Spring 3.1.3, and java 17:

build.gradle:

plugins {
    id 'java'
    id 'org.springframework.boot' version '3.1.3'
    id 'io.spring.dependency-management' version '1.1.3'
}

apply plugin: 'application'

group = 'com.example'
version = '0.0.1-SNAPSHOT'

java {
    sourceCompatibility = '17'
}

repositories {
    mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
    implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter'
    implementation 'io.projectreactor.netty:reactor-netty-core:1.0.37'
    implementation 'io.projectreactor.netty:reactor-netty-http:1.0.37'
    implementation('io.projectreactor.tools:blockhound:1.0.8.RELEASE')
    implementation 'javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api:1.3.2'
    testImplementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-test'
}

tasks.named('test') {
    useJUnitPlatform()
}

task(echoServer, dependsOn: 'classes', type: JavaExec) {
    main = 'com.example.EchoServer'
    classpath = sourceSets.main.runtimeClasspath
    args ''
    systemProperty "io.netty.leakDetectionLevel", "DISABLED"
    debugOptions {
        enabled = false
        port = 5005
        server = true
        suspend = true
    }
}

DemoApplication.java:

package com.example.demo;

import org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication;
import org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.SpringBootApplication;

@SpringBootApplication
public class DemoApplication {
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		SpringApplication.run(DemoApplication.class, args);
	}
}

Demo.java:

package com.example.demo;

import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import reactor.blockhound.BlockHound;
import reactor.netty.tcp.TcpServer;

import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;

@Component
public class Demo {
    static final int PORT = Integer.parseInt(System.getProperty("port", "8080"));

    @PostConstruct
    public void init() {
        System.out.println("Jdk version used: " + System.getProperty("java.version"));
        BlockHound.install();

        TcpServer server =
                TcpServer.create()
                        .port(PORT)
                        .handle((in, out) -> {
                            try {
                                Thread.sleep(100);
                            } catch (Throwable err) {
                                err.printStackTrace();
                            }
                            return out.send(in.receive().retain());
                        });

        server.bindNow()
                .onDispose()
                .block();
    }
}

then, from one console using java17:

./gradlew build
java -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods -jar build/libs/demo-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar

from another console:

curl -v http://localhost:8080/foo

this will display the following from the first console:

reactor.blockhound.BlockingOperationError: Blocking call! java.lang.Thread.sleep
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.sleep(Thread.java)
	at com.example.demo.Demo.lambda$init$0(Demo.java:34)
	at reactor.netty.tcp.TcpServer$OnConnectionHandle.accept(TcpServer.java:277)
	at reactor.netty.tcp.TcpServer$OnConnectionHandle.accept(TcpServer.java:264)
	at reactor.netty.transport.ServerTransportConfig$ServerTransportDoOnConnection.onStateChange(ServerTransportConfig.java:253)
	at reactor.netty.transport.ServerTransport$ChildObserver.onStateChange(ServerTransport.java:481)
	at reactor.netty.channel.ChannelOperationsHandler.channelActive(ChannelOperationsHandler.java:62)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:262)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:238)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:231)
	at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$HeadContext.channelActive(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:1398)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:258)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:238)
	at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.fireChannelActive(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:895)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel$AbstractUnsafe.register0(AbstractChannel.java:522)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel$AbstractUnsafe.access$200(AbstractChannel.java:429)
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel$AbstractUnsafe$1.run(AbstractChannel.java:486)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.runTask(AbstractEventExecutor.java:174)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.safeExecute(AbstractEventExecutor.java:167)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor.runAllTasks(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:470)
	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:569)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:997)
	at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

Thanks.

hi, i know it's been a super long time, but since this thread is a lot active, i would like to add my part,
for Spring 3.1.3, and java 17,
the -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods flag works good indeed if used with the following command:
java -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods -jar target/Required_jar_file.jar,

using Blockhound with JDK 22 is not working, even when using "-XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods" option: Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: The instrumentation have failed. It looks like you're running on JDK 13+. You need to add '-XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods' JVM flag. See #33 for more info. at reactor.blockhound.BlockHound$Builder.testInstrumentation(BlockHound.java:538) at reactor.blockhound.BlockHound$Builder.install(BlockHound.java:501) at reactor.blockhound.BlockHound.install(BlockHound.java:91) at reactor.blockhound.junit.platform.BlockHoundTestExecutionListener.<clinit>(BlockHoundTestExecutionListener.java:19) ... 39 more this is because during initialization, Blockhound is trying to instrument the Thread.sleep() method, and if it does not work, then the initialization fails and assumes that the failure comes from a missing "-XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods" option. but, here the problem is that in JDK 22, the internal native method called by Thread.sleep has changed, it's "Thread.sleepNanos0" instead of "Thread.sleep0". This PR corrects the instrumentation for Thread.sleepNanos0 native method when the JDK version is detected to be 22+ Fixes #404

) * Bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin from 3.1.0 to 3.2.2 Bumps [org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin](https://github.com/apache/maven-gpg-plugin) from 3.1.0 to 3.2.2. - [Release notes](https://github.com/apache/maven-gpg-plugin/releases) - [Commits](apache/maven-gpg-plugin@maven-gpg-plugin-3.1.0...maven-gpg-plugin-3.2.2) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> * work around for issue reactor/BlockHound#33 --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: cprutle <[email protected]>

bsideup added the area/java-agent label Jun 2, 2019

bsideup changed the title ~~UnsupportedOperationException with OpenJDK 13~~ OpenJDK 13 requires -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods flag Jul 19, 2019

bsideup pinned this issue Jul 19, 2019

bsideup added the status/has-workaround This has a known workaround described label Aug 2, 2019

bsideup mentioned this issue Oct 31, 2019

NettyBlockHoundIntegrationTest.testBlockingCallsInNettyThreads fails with JDK 13 netty/netty#9738

Closed

anuraaga mentioned this issue Dec 2, 2019

Return a CompletableFuture from API methods that checks whether… line/armeria#2275

Merged

bsideup mentioned this issue Jan 14, 2020

Blockhound doesn't detect the blocking call in my environment (Java 13 on windows) dsibilio/blockhound-demo#1

Closed

bsideup mentioned this issue Mar 26, 2020

Perform a smoke test after instrumenting the classes. #104

Merged

brneto pushed a commit to neueda/java-reactive-microservices-chassis that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2021

Remove blockhound dependency

e8dffca

Removed due to issues with OpenJDK version 13+ reactor/BlockHound#33

marcusdacoregio added a commit to marcusdacoregio/spring-security that referenced this issue Oct 7, 2021

Remove BlockHound dependency

30812ec

The dependency is not needed anymore and there is a issue when using OpenJDK 13 or higher reactor/BlockHound#33 Issue spring-projectsgh-10343

marcusdacoregio added a commit to marcusdacoregio/spring-security that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2021

Remove BlockHound dependency

a3b60ae

The dependency is not needed anymore and there is a issue when using OpenJDK 13 or higher reactor/BlockHound#33 Issue spring-projectsgh-10343

rwinch pushed a commit to spring-projects/spring-security that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2021

Remove BlockHound dependency

1ea63e3

The dependency is not needed anymore and there is a issue when using OpenJDK 13 or higher reactor/BlockHound#33 Issue gh-10343

rwinch pushed a commit to spring-projects/spring-security that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2021

Remove BlockHound dependency

189ad4a

The dependency is not needed anymore and there is a issue when using OpenJDK 13 or higher reactor/BlockHound#33 Issue gh-10343

marcusdacoregio added a commit to marcusdacoregio/spring-security that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2021

Remove BlockHound dependency

5609626

The dependency is not needed anymore and there is a issue when using OpenJDK 13 or higher reactor/BlockHound#33 Issue spring-projectsgh-10343

millems mentioned this issue Feb 16, 2022

Allow SDK to build on JDK 17 aws/aws-sdk-java-v2#3037

Merged

simonbasle added the help wanted We need contributions on this label Apr 7, 2022

jrhee17 mentioned this issue Oct 20, 2022

Provide blockhound integrations line/armeria#4493

Merged

pderop mentioned this issue Jan 3, 2023

BlockHoundTestExecutionListener could not be instantiated (JDK 17) #308

Closed

FenstonSingel mentioned this issue Apr 5, 2023

Tests for kotlinx-coroutines-debug module fail on JDK 17 due to outdated BlockHound version Kotlin/kotlinx.coroutines#3701

Closed

OliverO2 mentioned this issue May 17, 2023

Respect Run Tests Using setting kotest/kotest-intellij-plugin#178

Open

cprutle added a commit to CybercentreCanada/assemblyline-java-client that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2024

work around for issue reactor/BlockHound#33

5bcbdd4

cprutle added a commit to CybercentreCanada/assemblyline-java-client that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2024

work around for issue reactor/BlockHound#33

307135e

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

OpenJDK 13 requires -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods flag #33

OpenJDK 13 requires -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods flag #33

juergenzimmermann commented Jun 2, 2019

bsideup commented Jun 2, 2019

juergenzimmermann commented Jun 2, 2019

bsideup commented Jun 2, 2019

yburkouski commented Nov 9, 2019 •

edited

Loading

sergey-morenets commented May 10, 2020

jaschenk commented Jul 30, 2020 •

edited

Loading

abdullahumer commented Nov 29, 2020

bsideup commented Nov 30, 2020

abdullahumer commented Dec 1, 2020

roimenashe commented Aug 25, 2021

CodeGTDLearn commented Feb 17, 2022

KrzysztofKwiatkowskiK commented Feb 24, 2022

ajax-semenov-y commented Sep 17, 2022

juliojgd commented Dec 19, 2022

patpatpat123 commented May 15, 2023

pderop commented May 15, 2023

divyanshsaini1805 commented Oct 17, 2023 •

edited

Loading

pderop commented Oct 19, 2023

apferrarone commented Jan 12, 2024 •

edited

Loading

divyanshsaini1805 commented Jan 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

OpenJDK 13 requires -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods flag #33

OpenJDK 13 requires -XX:+AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods flag #33

Comments

juergenzimmermann commented Jun 2, 2019

bsideup commented Jun 2, 2019

juergenzimmermann commented Jun 2, 2019

bsideup commented Jun 2, 2019

yburkouski commented Nov 9, 2019 • edited Loading

sergey-morenets commented May 10, 2020

jaschenk commented Jul 30, 2020 • edited Loading

abdullahumer commented Nov 29, 2020

bsideup commented Nov 30, 2020

abdullahumer commented Dec 1, 2020

roimenashe commented Aug 25, 2021

CodeGTDLearn commented Feb 17, 2022

KrzysztofKwiatkowskiK commented Feb 24, 2022

ajax-semenov-y commented Sep 17, 2022

juliojgd commented Dec 19, 2022

patpatpat123 commented May 15, 2023

pderop commented May 15, 2023

divyanshsaini1805 commented Oct 17, 2023 • edited Loading

pderop commented Oct 19, 2023

apferrarone commented Jan 12, 2024 • edited Loading

divyanshsaini1805 commented Jan 16, 2024 • edited Loading

yburkouski commented Nov 9, 2019 •

edited

Loading

jaschenk commented Jul 30, 2020 •

edited

Loading

divyanshsaini1805 commented Oct 17, 2023 •

edited

Loading

apferrarone commented Jan 12, 2024 •

edited

Loading

divyanshsaini1805 commented Jan 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading