Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify REMIND Calibration Data Transfer #1545

Open
0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Simplify REMIND Calibration Data Transfer #1545

0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q
Copy link
Member

The split between CES parameters in the .inc file and the .gdx file is a left-over from the development time of the CES calibration.
We could cut down on complexity and possible sources of error by simply dropping the .inc files, as the CES parameters should not be changed in between. (Currently there is a bug concerning this: #1544). We could also augment the gdxes by some calibration information like

Scalar
  s_calibration_info   "this run was calibrated on yyyy-mm-dd to input data revision …"
;
@LaviniaBaumstark
Copy link
Member

sounds good to harmonize the process of reading data for the calibration. I alos like the idea of havin the info on which input data the calibration was based on

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants