You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The split between CES parameters in the .inc file and the .gdx file is a left-over from the development time of the CES calibration.
We could cut down on complexity and possible sources of error by simply dropping the .inc files, as the CES parameters should not be changed in between. (Currently there is a bug concerning this: #1544). We could also augment the gdxes by some calibration information like
Scalar
s_calibration_info "this run was calibrated on yyyy-mm-dd to input data revision …"
;
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sounds good to harmonize the process of reading data for the calibration. I alos like the idea of havin the info on which input data the calibration was based on
The split between CES parameters in the .inc file and the .gdx file is a left-over from the development time of the CES calibration.
We could cut down on complexity and possible sources of error by simply dropping the .inc files, as the CES parameters should not be changed in between. (Currently there is a bug concerning this: #1544). We could also augment the gdxes by some calibration information like
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: