We are all excited by the progress made by many authors to make their papers reproducible by publishing associated code and data.
We know how challenging it can be so we want to showcase the value of the practice, both for original authors and as a learning experience for those who attempt to reproduce the work.
It's imperative to note that ReproHacks are by no means an attempt to criticise or discredit work. We see reproduction as beneficial scientific activity in itself, with useful outcomes for authors and valuable learning experiences for the participants and the research community as a whole.
We invite nominations for papers that have both associated code and data publicly available. We also encourage analyses based on open source tools as we cannot guarantee participants will have access to specialised licenced software.
Current list of proposed papers and projects
Join us at the hack to dig into exciting science, learn more about reproducibility, working with other people's code and data and more!
There’s also opportunity for contributing to ReproHack development. Here's a few potential directions:
-
Reproducible ReproHacks: Build a toolkit to produce all materials required to run an event
-
Remote ReproHacks: [discussion topic] Can we run a ReproHack remotely?
-
Ability to sample from the literature.: A call for papers doesn’t scale well and biases any data on reproducibility generated. It would be great to have a tool to sample the literature for papers to reproduce.
-
ReScience Submission Templates: improvements in reproducibility might open the door for deeper treatment of materials and potentially moving towards replications. It would be great to provide a framework to submit work done during a ReproHack to the ReScience journal.
More details on the development topics
This is the master repo of the hack. We'll collect information on the teams and projects through issues in this repo. We'll track of discussions and collaborative notes on the event hackpad
As all Carpentries events, we strive to make this event open and inclusive to all. As such the event is governed by the Carpentries Code of Conduct and you should read it before participating. By participating, you are expected to uphold this code.
We encourage authors that are keen, to be available for participants to reach out to for guidance or even just to say hello! We've set up a gitter channel as a public lobby where you can also reach the organisers prior to the hack. You can also start discussions or add comments through our collaborative hackpad.
Introduction & Welcome slides
We'll start with a brief review of the papers proposed and hack topics and then form into teams.
- In your teams decide which paper/hack topic you wish to work on.
- To register your team and paper / topic open a new issue in this repository using the issue templates provided.
- Complete details and create.
- Please also add each individual participants details in the relevant section of the hackpad so we have a complete list of participants.
Follow any instructions/documentation associated with the papers and try and reproduce the work. As you work through your paper, keep in mind the main points on which feedback to the authors will provided, Reproducibility, Documentation and Reusability. It might help to have a look at the feedback form before you begin and keep notes during. Feel free to use the event hackpad for that.
We'll come together during the day to discuss progress and troubleshoot any sticking points.
Should you finish reproducing your paper quickly, you might want to consider attempting to replicate the results, for example, if the code is in R consider translating the analysis to python and examining whether you are getting the same results. Such a contribution would be appropriate for publication in the ReScience C journal! Have a look at the journals website for further details.
Should you produce any additional materials relating to your reproduction during the session, we ask that you share it publicly and update your team's issue with any relevant URLs.
Please complete the Reproducibility feedback form. Please also remember to be kind and constructive. Reproducibilty is hard and all authors submitting their papers have been incredibly brave. Here's an example of feedback to authors.
You can use the hackpad to take notes and summarise your experiences.
Feel free to contribute any additional thoughts on our collaborative hackpad. These can help form the basis for a blogpost on the event.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
