You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is the umbrella issue for the first distributed version of Restate.
The goal is to support a static 2f+1 node Restate cluster where killing f nodes won't cause downtime for the processing of invocations or loss of data. The cluster won't support membership changes. The metadata store and the cluster controller can run on a separate node with durable storage. Bonus points if the metadata store would be HA as well. It is ok if every node runs all partition processors.
Performance-wise, this version should be in the same ballpark as the single node Restate variant.
The content you are editing has changed. Please copy your edits and refresh the page.
This is the umbrella issue for the first distributed version of Restate.
The goal is to support a static
2f+1
node Restate cluster where killingf
nodes won't cause downtime for the processing of invocations or loss of data. The cluster won't support membership changes. The metadata store and the cluster controller can run on a separate node with durable storage. Bonus points if the metadata store would be HA as well. It is ok if every node runs all partition processors.Performance-wise, this version should be in the same ballpark as the single node Restate variant.
Tasks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: