You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I read about oils and its extensive https://github.com/oils-for-unix/oils/wiki/Spec-Tests. It is similar to brush yaml files and contains a lot of scripts from real-world codebases. Maybe we could use it directly or auto-format it into YAML files.
FYI, the recently merged PR ( #288 ) enables us to start using the basic input backend to run the upstream bash-completion test suite. That test suite, while focused on programmable completion, ends up being a good battery of compatibility tests due to how much complex bash-isms are used by bash-completion.
Would love to find the right way to run that suite regularly, and follow that pattern to bring online execution of other existing test suites (like the ones you mention).
I read about oils and its extensive https://github.com/oils-for-unix/oils/wiki/Spec-Tests. It is similar to brush yaml files and contains a lot of scripts from real-world codebases. Maybe we could use it directly or auto-format it into YAML files.
The stats for different shells can be found here https://www.oilshell.org/release/0.7.pre11/test/spec.wwz/for-expr.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: