Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Imgmin now gives god awful results. #60

Open
133794m3r opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Imgmin now gives god awful results. #60

133794m3r opened this issue Oct 11, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@133794m3r
Copy link

133794m3r commented Oct 11, 2016

I can't find my really old version of imgmin to compare but I just ran an image through it and it set the after quality to 65 as the "perfect" quality even though the image is full of jpeg artifacts normally imgmin has always given me images that I can't tell the difference between at 100% zoom only if I zoom in waymore than that can I begin to notice it.

imgmin's "optimzied" file that it says is nearly identical to the original image when it clearly is not as there is a crapton of compression artifacts throughout the image.
2016-10-08-000043- optimized
original file quailty was 90 non-progresive non optimized even huffman optimied via jpegtran
2016-10-08-000043

@rflynn
Copy link
Owner

rflynn commented Dec 11, 2016

thanks for the feedback and the examples.
for your usecase you may prefer more conservative settings -- have you tried imgmin's commandline options? -- see imgmin --help and look at --conservative, --very-conservative and --error-threshold N in that order to see if you can find options that work you.

@133794m3r
Copy link
Author

I didn't know it had any sort of options before it had always just worked I guess it's something to do with anime images I have genrally just used imgmin for all jpegs I have and never thought anything of it to save space.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants