Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is the license for Errata data? #191

Closed
pombredanne opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

What is the license for Errata data? #191

pombredanne opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pombredanne
Copy link

Is this feature request related to a problem? If so, please describe it.

What is the license for Errata data? I could not find one.
I reckon that several errata may be mirrored from RH, so their license (whatever it is) would likely apply too?

Describe the solution you'd like to see

I need a clear open license for inclusion in https://github.com/nexb/vulnerablecode and aboutcode-org/vulnerablecode#753

Have you considered alternative solutions/features? If so, please describe them.

No response

Version and Build Information

N/A

Additional Context

N/A

@pombredanne
Copy link
Author

I likely filed this issue in the wrong repo .... Should be in https://github.com/resf/distro-tools/tree/main/apollo instead?

@NeilHanlon
Copy link
Member

Hey - No worries about filing it here. The license for the errata data is the same as RH, that is, CC-BY-4.0.

The data resources linked on this page as well as their alternative representations available through the Security Data API are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. If you distribute this content or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat, Inc. and provide a link to the original.

https://access.redhat.com/security/data

@rocky-linux rocky-linux locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 24, 2024
@NeilHanlon NeilHanlon converted this issue into discussion #193 Jul 24, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants