Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting end effector constraints when using STOMP #68

Open
ghost opened this issue Apr 27, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Setting end effector constraints when using STOMP #68

ghost opened this issue Apr 27, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 27, 2018

Hi all,
I'm trying out STOMP as per the tutorial here, but havent figured out how to set orientation constraints for the end effector so that it maintains a certain orientation throughout the trajectory. Is it possible to set this via yaml?

@Levi-Armstrong
Copy link
Contributor

I don't believe this is currently implemented. You will need to write a noisy generator plugin that generator states that satisfy your constraints. You could get this from moveit ompl constraint sampler. Then may need a custom plugin for merging the noisy trajectories but not certain this plugin would be needed.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Apr 29, 2018

Thank you for the reply Levi. Would this link be a good starting point?

@jrgnicho
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is partially addressed now in that you can set orientation constraints on the cartesian goal however STOMP won't apply this to the rest of the waypoints in the trajectory.

@ib101
Copy link

ib101 commented Dec 12, 2019

Any update on this? Would love to use STOMP, its STOMP-tastic!

@jrgnicho
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @ib101 , the stomp planner packages have been moved into their own repository. As far as I know, no one at the moment is working on such a feature but you're welcome to submit a PR for this in the new repo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants