Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Noetic release #256

Closed
TheDelus opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 11 comments
Closed

Noetic release #256

TheDelus opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 11 comments

Comments

@TheDelus
Copy link

TheDelus commented Jun 2, 2020

Hi, is a release for ros-noetic planned for this package?

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

@dignakov
Copy link

Would this orocos/orocos_kinematics_dynamics#218 mean that kdl is no longer blocking?

If that's the case, I'd be happy to make the changes and submit a PR following http://wiki.ros.org/noetic/Migration#Use_Orocos_KDL_and_BFL_rosdep_keys

That way it would be ready to go once MoveIt is released for Noetic (would it need a different branch since it would break the current one?).

@simonschmeisser
Copy link
Contributor

@EvilPictureBook yes, please open a PR!

I also noticed that industrial_trajectory_filters does not compile due to a API change in MoveIt. We need to add this virtual function:

virtual void planning_request_adapter::PlanningRequestAdapter::initialize(const ros::NodeHandle&)

@seanyen
Copy link
Contributor

seanyen commented Aug 24, 2020

Just wondering, is there any plans to have a dedicate branch for melodic or noetic? Would it be welcome to consider Windows port fixes as it moves to newer releases?

@tylerjw
Copy link

tylerjw commented Sep 30, 2020

MoveIt is now released for Noetic, so this can go forward if that was what was blocking it.

@fmessmer
Copy link
Contributor

fmessmer commented Jan 14, 2021

there seems to be a noetic compatibility pr even: #258
what's the status of the noetic release?
any chance simple_message gets released as a partial release?

@simonschmeisser
Copy link
Contributor

I haven't received any feedback to my PR so far unfortunately ... maybe you could get it a review @fmessmer and then @gavanderhoorn would merge it?

@fmessmer
Copy link
Contributor

fmessmer commented Jan 15, 2021

I haven't received any feedback to my PR so far unfortunately ... maybe you could get it a review @fmessmer and then @gavanderhoorn would merge it?

I'm mainly interested in seeing simple_message released....I have no insight into these industrial-core packages as I'm only trying to satisfy our noetic dependencies...thus, unfortunately, I don't see myself qualified to review...but simple_message doesn't seem to be blocked as it already seems noetic-ready...thus, I asked for a partial release...sorry

@fmessmer
Copy link
Contributor

I can confirm that (at least) simple_message compiles on noetic from ros-industrial/industrial_core#kinetic-devel
👉 so a partial release should be possible for simple_message

I can also confirm that with #258 all packages of industrial_core compile on noetic
👉 so a full release should be possible after merging #258

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

Done: ros/rosdistro#30044.

Even though it hasn't been merged yet, I'm going to close this issue, as it's basically just 'formalities' at this point.

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

Note: I opted to release without #271 merged. It'll already unblock releases of other packages and as that PR potentially changes behaviour, I thought it'd be good to first get a release out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants