-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance for large archives #7
Comments
The performance seems to be quite good, I was able to mount and browse a 16GB zip archive without any issues. however, since the mounting takes some time in this case, a message should be displayed that the archive is being prepared/mounted. And instead of the following log entry, a corresponding message should be displayed when a user tries to mount the archive again if it is currently being prepared/mounted in the background.
|
Here we have to decide what should happen:
So in this case I would vote that a frontend mount just should cancel the background job. If the user tries to file a second background job then the user should be informed that one is already pending. What is also missing would be a control to cancel a pending job. One could use the mount-point list in the sidebar tab and add an entry for a pending mounts, not only for successful mounts. I think that this should be enough. Pending mounts would have a cancel button. Successful mounts already have a "Disconnect storage" button. |
Trying to mount iso images or large tar files I find that the performance in these cases is just not sufficient. The problem is that the current implementation scans the entire archive on each actual access to the storage, and this is really slow for large archives.
To improve this we could
I already have setThe situation has to be analysed.file_system_check_changes
to 0 in the mount-point but I have the impression that Nextcloud still rescans the storage.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: