Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Meeting] 19th Feb, 2020 #86

Open
Lokathor opened this issue Feb 5, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

[Meeting] 19th Feb, 2020 #86

Lokathor opened this issue Feb 5, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
Meeting Meeting agendas / notes

Comments

@Lokathor
Copy link
Member

Lokathor commented Feb 5, 2020

@Lokathor Lokathor added the Meeting Meeting agendas / notes label Feb 5, 2020
@Wodann
Copy link
Contributor

Wodann commented Feb 5, 2020

I've created issue #88 for the second topic.

@ozkriff
Copy link
Member

ozkriff commented Feb 7, 2020

Ask @ozkriff to put a link to our working group into the r/rust_gamedev sidebar.

Done.

I guess, r/rust_gamedev's description wasn't updated for a while. I've asked Efraet if the WG could propose an updated version.

@aclysma
Copy link
Contributor

aclysma commented Feb 7, 2020

I missed the meeting so I may be out of the loop, but I think a roadmap for 2020 sounds great. I think it would be helpful to go through the responses to the question "What do you think should be the game-dev working group's priorities for the next 3-6 months" in the survey to identify a few high-priority things

@msiglreith
Copy link

We had a bit of a conversation with @aclysma regarding the possible content of the roadmap based on the survey:

  • Ecosystem maturity: Provide an overview for people to see where we are and what to work on (C/C++ bindings, Rust libraries, etc.). Asset pipeline an interesting topic to help people starting.
  • Iteration times: Difficult to tackle imo beside scripting languages, general compiler optimizations, or dynamic linking
  • Documentation: Driven by individuals, gamedev wg should providing a place to link resources and promote them in monthly newsletters (as already done by @ozkriff ❤️ )
  • Game Engines: Nope - for others to tackle
  • Consoles: Trying to push in the background for people with access, just mention on the roadmap that the workgroup is actively working on it and try to gather people for working on it
  • Ecosystem coordination: we had some success here, it’s something we want to continue. Bringing people together for windowing, threading, async, allocator, etc. Library blessing difficult beside saying 'hey these are libs many people use'.
  • Foundational libraries: Splitting of libraries into 'ugly low level' and 'rusty-opinionated high level' often helpful. For example audio libraries, input handling or math.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Meeting Meeting agendas / notes
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants