Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add filecoin mainnet #170

Closed
FroghubMan opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #191
Closed

Add filecoin mainnet #170

FroghubMan opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #191

Comments

@FroghubMan
Copy link

Network information

@Uxio0
Copy link
Member

Uxio0 commented Jun 1, 2023

We cannot estimate gas for the network

 body: '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":45,"error":{"code":1,"message":"gas search failed: message execution failed: exit SysErrSenderStateInvalid(2), reason: pre-validation failed: Actor balance less than needed: 0.0 \\u003c 0.069999999970124091\\n (RetCode=2)"}}\n',
  requestBody: '{"method":"eth_estimateGas","params":[{"data":"0x604580600e600039806000f350fe7fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffe03601600081602082378035828234f58015156039578182fd5b8082525050506014600cf3"}],"id":45,"jsonrpc":"2.0"}',

@FroghubMan
Copy link
Author

We cannot estimate gas for the network

 body: '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":45,"error":{"code":1,"message":"gas search failed: message execution failed: exit SysErrSenderStateInvalid(2), reason: pre-validation failed: Actor balance less than needed: 0.0 \\u003c 0.069999999970124091\\n (RetCode=2)"}}\n',
  requestBody: '{"method":"eth_estimateGas","params":[{"data":"0x604580600e600039806000f350fe7fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffe03601600081602082378035828234f58015156039578182fd5b8082525050506014600cf3"}],"id":45,"jsonrpc":"2.0"}',

It is a problem caused by insufficient balance of the message sender, I just sent 1 FIL to the sender address (0xE1CB04A0fA36DdD16a06ea828007E35e1a3cBC37), can you try again?

@FroghubMan
Copy link
Author

The Filecoin network only supports EIP-1559 transaction, not legacy transactions. Can you generate an EIP-1559 deploy transaction? (The Filecoin test network also has the same problem #171, and the generated legacy transaction cannot be used)

We also submitted a PR #177 to support generating EIP-1559 transaction. @Uxio0

Uxio0 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2023
- Closes #189
- Closes #188
- Closes #183
- Closes #182
- Closes #170
- Closes #148
- Closes #145
Uxio0 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2023
- Closes #189
- Closes #188
- Closes #183
- Closes #182
- Closes #170
- Closes #148
- Closes #145
@Uxio0 Uxio0 closed this as completed in 2de77a5 Jul 7, 2023
@Uxio0 Uxio0 closed this as completed in #191 Jul 7, 2023
@tzapu
Copy link

tzapu commented Sep 27, 2023

hey guys, I hope I am not missing something obvious, saying something really stupid, but why have both the filecoin testnet and mainnet issues been completed? 0x914d7Fec6aaC8cd542e72Bca78B30650d45643d7 does not appear to be deployed on any, and trying to run the transaction still ends up with {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"error":{"code":1,"message":"legacy transaction is not supported"}} probably because of #177

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants