Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

air-interface:maintenance-timer #30

Open
demx8as6 opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

air-interface:maintenance-timer #30

demx8as6 opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@demx8as6
Copy link
Collaborator

In the excel spreadsheet line 100 is documented that the ONF air interface supports an integer to configure a maintenance window in seconds.

  |  +--rw air-interface:maintenance-timer?                  int32

Proposed solution

Add in the augmentation to the ietf-interface the following yang leaf:

    leaf maintenance-timer-duration {
      type uint32;
      units "s";
      default "0";
      description
        "Maintenance Feature: The duration of existence for any maintenance configuration, such as the loopback feature. A value of '0' indicates that the maintenance timer is deactivated. ";
    }
@demx8as6
Copy link
Collaborator Author

demx8as6 commented Jan 31, 2024

It seams that RFC8533 does not cover - and maybe even should not cover, when looking to RFC7276 - the requested functionality.

Therefore an update of RFC8561 is proposed.

  augment /if:interfaces/if:interface:
       [...]
       +--rw maintenance-mode
          +--rw start?      yang:date-and-time
          +--rw end?        yang:date-and-time
          +--ro duration?   uint32
          +--ro status?     boolean

Please see: ietf-onf-gab-discussion.yang.txt

@JonasAhl
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this only for info, or is the system expected to do roll-back of any configurations at the end of the maintenance interval? In that case, how do you specify which configurations to roll-back?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants