You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue: There is no way to add a help description to a macro, making it difficult to understand the purpose and usage of a macro without inspecting the code directly.
Desired Behavior: There should be a way to attach a description or help text to a macro that can be accessed when needed.
Attaching Keystrokes to Macros
Request: It is not possible to associate specific keybindings with macros. It would be useful to bind macros to keystrokes for faster execution without having to manually invoke them each time.
Expected Behavior: Allow macros to be bound to keystrokes or key combinations, similar to how VisiData allows keybindings for other actions.
Input Parameters for Macros
Request: Macros currently cannot take input parameters, limiting their flexibility. It would be useful to pass parameters into macros, enabling more dynamic and reusable macro behavior.
Expected Behavior: Allow macros to accept input parameters, which can be used within the macro logic for customized behavior.
Possible Bugs:
Deleting Macros Corrupts macros.jsonl File
Issue: When trying to delete a macro by removing rows from the macro sheet, it seems to corrupt the macros.jsonl file, leading to potential data integrity issues and failure to load or use macros properly.
Expected Behavior: Deleting macros should be a safe operation that is documented and doesn't cause corruption or issues with the macro storage file.
Asynchronous Issues with addcol-shell Command in Macros
Issue: There appear to be asynchronous issues when using the addcol-shell command within macros, possibly leading to race conditions or unexpected behavior.
Expected Behavior: addcol-shell should work synchronously or handle asynchronous execution properly when used in macros.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
would it make sense to have some way to pass input to a macro? Maybe as part of running the macro, it could take input. It looks like it would also be useful to be able to provide a "type" for history purposes, and the ability to specify 'defaultLast=True'.
Feature Requests:
No Help Description for Macros
Attaching Keystrokes to Macros
Input Parameters for Macros
Possible Bugs:
Deleting Macros Corrupts
macros.jsonl
Filemacros.jsonl
file, leading to potential data integrity issues and failure to load or use macros properly.Asynchronous Issues with
addcol-shell
Command in Macrosaddcol-shell
command within macros, possibly leading to race conditions or unexpected behavior.addcol-shell
should work synchronously or handle asynchronous execution properly when used in macros.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: