-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
s06-the-legal-system-in-the-united.html
629 lines (613 loc) · 108 KB
/
s06-the-legal-system-in-the-united.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<link href="shared/bookhub.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<title>The Legal System in the United States</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id=navbar-top class="navbar">
<div class="navbar-part left">
<a href="s05-introduction-to-criminal-law.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-left.png"></a> <a href="s05-introduction-to-criminal-law.html">Previous Chapter</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part middle">
<a href="index.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-up.png"></a> <a href="index.html">Table of Contents</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part right">
<a href="s07-constitutional-protections.html">Next Chapter</a> <a href="s07-constitutional-protections.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-right.png"></a>
</div>
</div>
<div id="book-content">
<div class="chapter" id="storm_1.0-ch02" version="5.0" lang="en">
<h1 class="title editable block">
<span class="title-prefix">Chapter 2</span> The Legal System in the United States</h1>
<div class="informalfigure medium block">
<img src="section_06/7e1321408cc0d6163603a56303bd7dc5.jpg">
<div class="copyright">
<p class="para">Source: Image courtesy of Tara Storm.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="epigraph block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_ep01">
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_p01">The requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt has this vital role in our criminal procedure for cogent reasons. The accused, during a criminal prosecution, has at stake interests of immense importance, both because of the possibility that he may lose his liberty upon conviction and because of the certainty that he would be stigmatized by the conviction.</p>
<p class="attribution"><a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0397_0358_ZO.html"><em class="emphasis">In re: Winship</em></a>, cited in <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch02_s04#storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s02">Section 2 "Burden of Proof in a Criminal Prosecution"</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01" condition="start-of-chunk" version="5.0" lang="en">
<h2 class="title editable block">
<span class="title-prefix">2.1</span> Federalism</h2>
<div class="learning_objectives editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_n01">
<h3 class="title">Learning Objectives</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_l01">
<li>Define federalism.</li>
<li>Ascertain the sections of the Constitution that give Congress regulatory authority.</li>
<li>Ascertain the basis for Congress’s authority to enact criminal laws.</li>
<li>Compare federal regulatory authority with state regulatory authority.</li>
<li>Compare federal criminal laws with state criminal laws.</li>
<li>Define federal supremacy.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_p01">The United States’ system of government is called <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">federalism</a><span class="glossdef">A system of government in which power is divided between a national, federal government and several state governments.</span></span>. Federalism, as set forth in the US Constitution, divides governmental power between the <em class="emphasis">federal government</em> and each of the <em class="emphasis">states</em>. This prevents a concentrated source of governmental power in one individual or small group of individuals. Because of federalism, the United States has one federal legal system, and each state has its own state legal system. Thus in the United States, a plethora of legal systems all operate harmoniously at the same time.</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">The Scope of Federal Law</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s01_p01">The government’s power to regulate comes from the US Constitution. The <em class="emphasis">federal</em> government derives its authority to create law from Article I, § 8, which discusses federal Congress’s <em class="emphasis">exclusive</em> or <strong class="emphasis bold">delegated powers</strong>. These include the power to regulate currency and coin, establish a post office, promote science and art by regulating the rights to discoveries and writings, declare war and raise armies, conduct foreign affairs, regulate interstate and foreign commerce, and make laws necessary and proper to execute other powers expressly granted in the Constitution. Courts have interpreted the last two powers mentioned in the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">commerce clause</a><span class="glossdef">A clause in the Constitution that allows Congress to regulate commerce (economic activity) that crosses state lines.</span></span> and the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">necessary and proper clause</a><span class="glossdef">A clause in the Constitution that allows Congress to make laws necessary to carry out all powers listed in the Constitution.</span></span> to be the <em class="emphasis">broadest</em> sources of federal regulatory authority.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s01_p02">To simplify and summarize precedent defining federal regulatory authority, federal laws are meant to regulate in two areas. First, federal laws regulate issues that concern the <em class="emphasis">country</em>, rather than just one city, county, or state. The federal government regulates in the area of foreign affairs, for example, because this affects the United States of America, not just one particular region. Second, federal laws regulate commerce, which is economic activity, that <em class="emphasis">crosses from state to state</em>. Some common examples are television broadcasts, the Internet, and any form of transportation such as the airlines.</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s01_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Federal Criminal Laws</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s01_s01_p01">The original intent was for the federal government to be a <em class="emphasis">limited</em> government, with the bulk of regulatory authority residing in the <em class="emphasis">states</em>. The only <em class="emphasis">crimes</em> Congress is specifically authorized to punish are piracies and felonies on the high seas, counterfeiting, and treason; however, case precedent has expanded the federal government’s power to enact criminal laws based on the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_001"><em class="emphasis">McCulloch v. Maryland</em>, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819), accessed August 28, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0017_0316_ZS.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0017_0316_ZS.html</a>.</span> Still, there must be <em class="emphasis">some</em> connection to an issue of national character and interstate commerce, or the federal government will overstep its authority. In general, federal criminal laws target conduct that occurs on federal property or conduct involving federal employees, currency, coin, treason, national security, rights secured by the Constitution, or commerce that crosses state lines. Currently, over five hundred crimes are listed in Part I, Title 18 of the United States Code, which codifies criminal laws for the federal government.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s01_s01_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 2.1</span> Diagram of Federal Laws</p>
<img src="section_06/189beffec311111907b851fd052b8178.jpg">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s02">
<h2 class="title editable block">The Scope of State Law</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s02_p01">The US Constitution designates the states as the <em class="emphasis">primary regulatory authority</em>. This is clarified in the Tenth Amendment, which reads, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited to it by the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or the people.” State laws are also supposed to regulate in two areas. First, state laws regulate issues of a <em class="emphasis">local</em> character or concern. A state may regulate, for example, its water ownership and use because water can be scarce and is not generally provided to other states. Second, state laws regulate issues or things that remain within a state’s border. A state generally regulates, for example, the operation of a small business whose products are only sold locally and not shipped out of the state.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s02_p02">Federal laws are <em class="emphasis">the same</em> in every state, but state laws <em class="emphasis">differ</em> from state to state. Something that is legal in one state may be illegal in another state. This inconsistency makes our system of federalism complicated for students (and lawyers). However, with a country as large and varied as the United States, it is sensible to allow each state to choose for itself which laws will be most suitable.</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s02_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">State Criminal Laws</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s02_s01_p01">The power to enact criminal laws belongs almost <em class="emphasis">exclusively</em> to the states. This is because of the Tenth Amendment, which vests in states a <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">police power</a><span class="glossdef">The states’ power to regulate for citizens’ health, safety, and welfare, as set forth in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution.</span></span> to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of state citizens. Approximately 90 percent of all criminal laws are state, rather than federal. Often, federal crimes are also state crimes and can be prosecuted and punished by both the state and federal government without violating the principle of double jeopardy.</p>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s02_s02">
<h2 class="title editable block">Example of the Diversity of State Laws</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s02_s02_p01">In Nevada, prostitution is legal under certain circumstances.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_002">N.R.S. § 201.354, accessed September 24, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/NRS-201.html#NRS201Sec354">http://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/NRS-201.html#NRS201Sec354</a>.</span> An individual who engages in prostitution inside a licensed “house of prostitution” in Nevada is not exposed to criminal liability. However, if the <em class="emphasis">same individual</em> engages in prostitution in a <em class="emphasis">different state</em>, he or she may be subject to a criminal prosecution. Prostitution will be discussed in detail in <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch12#storm_1.0-ch12">Chapter 12 "Crimes against the Public"</a>.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s02_s02_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 2.2</span> Crack the Code</p>
<img src="section_06/1b8f135375f0cb6798bddd00a70e999d.jpg">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03">
<h2 class="title editable block">Federal Supremacy</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_p01">Our legal system is divided up to conform to the principle of federalism, so a potential exists for conflict between federal law and state law. A federal law may make something <em class="emphasis">illegal</em>; a state law may insist that it is <em class="emphasis">legal</em>. Whenever a conflict occurs between federal and state law, courts must follow the federal law. This is called <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">federal supremacy</a><span class="glossdef">If there is a conflict between federal and state law, courts must follow the federal law.</span></span>. As the Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the federal Constitution states, “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Example of Federal Supremacy</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_p01">In Washington and several other states, an individual may possess and use marijuana for medicinal purposes with a prescription.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_003">Washington State Medicinal Marijuana Act, Chapter 69.51A RCW, accessed August 28, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=69.51a&full=true">http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=69.51a&full=true</a>; see all states that legalize medicinal marijuana: “16 Legal Medical Marijuana States and DC,” ProCon.org website, accessed August 28, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000881">http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000881</a>.</span> Federal law prohibits possession and use of marijuana under <em class="emphasis">any circumstances</em>.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_004">21 U.S.C. Ch. 13 § 801 et. seq., accessed October 1, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/21cfr/21usc/index.html">http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/21cfr/21usc/index.html</a>.</span> Technically, this could be a conflict that violates <strong class="emphasis bold">federal supremacy</strong>. Until the courts address the federal supremacy issue, however, medical marijuana statutes can continue to stay in effect. Read about a recent ruling regarding the constitutionality of Michigan’s medicinal marijuana law under the Supremacy Clause: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.pressandguide.com/articles/2011/04/09/news/doc4d9f557b8ab37805648033.txt">http://www.pressandguide.com/articles/2011/04/09/news/doc4d9f557b8ab37805648033.txt</a>.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 2.3</span> Diagram of State Laws</p>
<img src="section_06/083e47b8ffb61654d7d78b775396b24b.jpg">
</div>
<div class="exercises editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_n01">
<h3 class="title">Law and Ethics: The Arizona Immigration Law</h3>
<p class="simpara">Can a State Regulate Immigration?</p>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_p02">Arizona passed a comprehensive immigration law designed to seek out and deport illegal immigrants. This law created a national furor, and its detractors insisted it would lead to unethical racial profiling. The federal government attacked the law in Federal District Court.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_005">Randal C. Archibold, “Judge Blocks Arizona’s Immigration Law,” The <em class="emphasis">New York Times</em> website, accessed October 1, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/us/29arizona.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/us/29arizona.html</a>.</span> Judge Susan Bolton issued a preliminary injunction that stopped enforcement of the sections of the law that required state law enforcement to check an immigrant’s status while enforcing other laws and that required immigrants to prove they were in the country legally or risk state charges.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_006">Randal C. Archibold, “Judge Blocks Arizona’s Immigration Law,” The <em class="emphasis">New York Times</em> website, accessed October 1, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/us/29arizona.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/us/29arizona.html</a>.</span> Read the District Court’s preliminary injunction ruling, which is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20100729_ARIZONA_DOC.pdf">http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20100729_ARIZONA_DOC.pdf</a>.</p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_l01">
<li>What is the basis for Judge Bolton’s decision? Check your answer using the answer key at the end of the chapter.</li>
</ol>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_p03">Read about the most recent ruling on Arizona’s immigration law by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://latindispatch.com/2011/05/10/arizonas-jan-brewer-to-appeal-immigration-law-to-u-s-supreme-court/">http://latindispatch.com/2011/05/10/arizonas-jan-brewer-to-appeal-immigration-law-to-u-s-supreme-court/</a>.</p>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_p04">Read about Utah’s immigration law: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://articles.cnn.com/2011-05-11/politics/utah.immigration.bill_1_utah-law-gary-herbert-utah-gov?_s=PM:POLITICS">http://articles.cnn.com/2011-05-11/politics/utah.immigration.bill_1_utah-law-gary-herbert-utah-gov?_s=PM:POLITICS</a>.</p>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_p05">Read about Alabama’s immigration law: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/10/tagblogsfindlawcom2011-freeenterprise-idUS123058502120110610">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/10/tagblogsfindlawcom2011-freeenterprise-idUS123058502120110610</a>.</p>
</div>
<div class="callout block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_n02">
<h3 class="title">
<em class="emphasis">U.S. v. State of Arizona</em> Video</h3>
<p class="simpara">10-16645 <em class="emphasis">U.S. v. State of Arizona</em></p>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_p07">This video is the Arizona governor’s appeal of the district court preliminary injunction:</p>
<div class="mediaobject">
<a data-iframe-code='<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ClSk_OrHSIM" condition="http://img.youtube.com/vi/ClSk_OrHSIM/0.jpg" vendor="youtube" width="450" height="340" scalefit="1"></iframe>' href="http://www.youtube.com/v/ClSk_OrHSIM" class="replaced-iframe" onclick="return replaceIframe(this)">(click to see video)</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="key_takeaways editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_n03">
<h3 class="title">Key Takeaways</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_l02">
<li>Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between one national, federal government and several independent state governments.</li>
<li>
<p class="para">Congress gets its regulatory authority from Article I § 8 of the federal Constitution. This includes several delegated powers, the commerce clause, and the necessary and proper clause.</p>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_l03">
<li>The commerce clause gives Congress the power to regulate commerce that crosses state lines.</li>
<li>The necessary and proper clause gives Congress the power to regulate if necessary to carry out all other powers listed in the Constitution.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The Constitution specifically authorizes Congress to punish piracies and felonies on the high seas, counterfeiting, and treason. Case precedent has also expanded the federal government’s power to enact criminal laws based on the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause.</li>
<li>The federal government is intended to be limited, with the bulk of regulatory authority residing in the states. The federal government is restricted to regulating in the areas designated in Article I § 8 of the federal Constitution. The states can regulate for the health, safety, and welfare of citizens pursuant to their police power, which is set forth in the Tenth Amendment of the federal Constitution.</li>
<li>Federal criminal laws criminalize conduct that occurs on federal property or involves federal employees, currency, coin, treason, national security, rights secured by the Constitution, or commerce that crosses state lines. State criminal laws make up 90 percent of all criminal laws, are designed to protect state citizens’ health, safety, and welfare, and often criminalize the same conduct as federal criminal laws.</li>
<li>Federal supremacy, which is set forth in the Supremacy Clause of the federal Constitution, requires courts to follow federal laws if there is a conflict between a federal and state law.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="exercises editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_n04">
<h3 class="title">Exercises</h3>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_p06">Answer the following questions. Check your answers using the answer key at the end of the chapter.</p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s03_s01_l04">
<li>Congress passes a law criminalizing the posting of child pornography on the Internet. Where does Congress get the authority to pass this criminal law? If a state has a criminal law criminalizing the same conduct, can both the state <em class="emphasis">and</em> federal government prosecute a defendant for one act of downloading child pornography?</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">U.S. v. Morrison</em>, 529 U.S. 518 (2000). Which part(s) of the Constitution did the US Supreme Court rely on when it held that 42 U.S.C. § 13981 is unconstitutional? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-5.ZS.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-5.ZS.html</a>.</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">Pennsylvania v. Nelson</em>, 350 U.S. 497 (1956). Why did the US Supreme Court invalidate the Pennsylvania Sedition Act? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/350/497/case.html">http://supreme.justia.com/us/350/497/case.html</a>.</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02" condition="start-of-chunk" version="5.0" lang="en">
<h2 class="title editable block">
<span class="title-prefix">2.2</span> The Branches of Government</h2>
<div class="learning_objectives editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_n01">
<h3 class="title">Learning Objectives</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_l01">
<li>Identify the three branches of government.</li>
<li>Ascertain the head of the federal and state legislative branches of government.</li>
<li>Compare the Senate and the House of Representatives.</li>
<li>Ascertain the head of the federal and state executive branches of government.</li>
<li>Ascertain the head of the federal and state judicial branches of government.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_p01">The federal Constitution was written to ensure that government power is distributed and never concentrated in one or more areas. This philosophy is served by <strong class="emphasis bold">federalism</strong>, where the federal government shares power with the states. It is also further served by dividing the government into three branches, all responsible for different government duties and all <em class="emphasis">checking and balancing</em> each other. The three branches of government are detailed in Articles I–III of the federal Constitution and are the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">legislative branch</a><span class="glossdef">The branch of government responsible for creating statutory law.</span></span>, the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">executive branch</a><span class="glossdef">The branch of government responsible for enforcing statutory law.</span></span>, and the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">judicial branch</a><span class="glossdef">The branch of government responsible for interpreting statutory and constitutional law(s).</span></span>. While the federal Constitution identifies only the federal branches of government, the principle of checks and balances applies to the states as well. Most states identify the three state branches of government in their state constitution.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_p02">Each branch of government has a distinct authority. When one branch encroaches on the duties of another, this is called a violation of <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">separation of powers</a><span class="glossdef">Each government branch must act only within the scope set forth in the Constitution.</span></span>. The <em class="emphasis">courts</em> decide whether a government branch has overstepped its boundaries because courts interpret the Constitution, which describes each branch’s sphere of influence. Thus the judicial branch, which consists of all the courts, retains the balance of power.</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">The Legislative Branch</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s01_p01">The <strong class="emphasis bold">legislative branch</strong> is responsible for creating statutory laws. Citizens of a state can vote for some state statutes by ballot, but the <strong class="emphasis bold">federal legislative branch</strong> enacts all federal statutes. In the federal government, the legislative branch is headed by Congress. States’ legislative branches are headed by a state legislature. Congress is <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">bicameral</a><span class="glossdef">Made up of two houses.</span></span>, which means it is made up of two houses. This system provides equal representation among the several states and by citizens of the United States. States are represented by the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">Senate</a><span class="glossdef">The house of Congress responsible for representing each state.</span></span>. Every state, no matter how large or small, gets two senators. Citizens are represented by the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">House of Representatives</a><span class="glossdef">The house of Congress responsible for representing each citizen of the United States.</span></span>. Membership in the House of Representatives is based on population. A heavily populated state, like California, has more representatives than a sparsely populated state, like Alaska. States’ legislatures are generally bicameral and have a similar structure to the federal system.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s01_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 2.4</span> Diagram of the Legislative Branch</p>
<img src="section_06/7b8c2b7bf4267f7e8bb99b51d29f2ba9.jpg">
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s01_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Examples of Legislative Branch Checks and Balances</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s01_s01_p01">The legislative branch can check and balance both the <em class="emphasis">executive</em> branch and the <em class="emphasis">judicial</em> branch. Congress can impeach the president of the United States, which is the first step toward removal from office. Congress can also enact statutes that supersede judicial opinions, as discussed in <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch01#storm_1.0-ch01">Chapter 1 "Introduction to Criminal Law"</a>. Similarly, state legislature can also impeach a governor or enact a state statute that supersedes a state case law.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s02">
<h2 class="title editable block">The Executive Branch</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s02_p01">The <strong class="emphasis bold">executive branch</strong> is responsible for enforcing the statutes enacted by the legislative branch. In the federal government, the executive branch is headed by the president of the United States. States’ executive branches are headed by the governor of the state.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s02_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 2.5</span> Diagram of the Executive Branch</p>
<img src="section_06/049044067843cca13ae5f423f36cd8ce.jpg">
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s02_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Examples of Executive Branch Checks and Balances</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s02_s01_p01">The executive branch can check and balance both the <em class="emphasis">legislative</em> branch and the <em class="emphasis">judicial</em> branch. The president of the United States can veto statutes proposed by Congress. The president also has the authority to nominate federal justices and judges, who thereafter serve for life. State executive branches have similar check and balancing authority; a governor can generally veto statutes proposed by state legislature and can appoint some state justices and judges.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03">
<h2 class="title editable block">The Judicial Branch</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_p01">The <strong class="emphasis bold">judicial branch</strong> is responsible for interpreting all laws, including statutes, codes, ordinances, and the federal and state constitutions. This power is all encompassing and is the basis for <strong class="emphasis bold">judicial review</strong>, referenced in <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch01#storm_1.0-ch01">Chapter 1 "Introduction to Criminal Law"</a>. It allows the judicial branch to invalidate any unconstitutional law in the statutory source of law and also to change the federal and state constitutions by interpretation. For example, when a court creates an exception to an amendment to the constitution, it has made an informal change without the necessity of a national or state consensus. The federal judicial branch is headed by the US Supreme Court. Each state’s judicial branch is headed by the highest-level state appellate court. Members of the judicial branch include all judges and justices of every federal and state court in the court system, which is discussed shortly.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 2.6</span> Diagram of the Judicial Branch</p>
<img src="section_06/0b1b4b7b70e0ca884f036156e660d6f4.jpg">
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Examples of Judicial Branch Checks and Balances</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_s01_p01">The judicial branch can check and balance both the <em class="emphasis">legislative</em> branch and the <em class="emphasis">executive</em> branch. The US Supreme Court can invalidate statutes enacted by Congress if they conflict with the Constitution. The US Supreme Court can also prevent the president from taking action if that action violates separation of powers. The state courts can likewise nullify unconstitutional statutes passed by the state legislature and void other executive branch actions that are unconstitutional.</p>
<div class="table block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_s01_t01" frame="all">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Table 2.1</span> The Most Prominent Checks and Balances between the Branches</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Government Branch</th>
<th>Duty or Authority</th>
<th>Check and Balance</th>
<th>Government Branch Checking and Balancing</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Legislative</td>
<td>Create statutes</td>
<td>President can veto</td>
<td>Executive</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Executive</td>
<td>Enforce statutes</td>
<td>Congress can override presidential veto by 2/3 majority</td>
<td>Legislative</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Judicial</td>
<td>Interpret statutes and Constitution</td>
<td>President nominates federal judges and justices</td>
<td>Executive</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Executive</td>
<td>Enforce statutes</td>
<td>Senate can confirm or reject presidential nomination of federal judges and justices</td>
<td>Legislative</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Executive</td>
<td>Enforce statutes</td>
<td>Congress can impeach the president</td>
<td>Legislative</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Legislative</td>
<td>Create statutes</td>
<td>Courts can invalidate unconstitutional statutes</td>
<td>Judicial</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Executive</td>
<td>Enforce statutes</td>
<td>Courts can invalidate unconstitutional executive action</td>
<td>Judicial</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Judicial</td>
<td>Interpret statutes and Constitution</td>
<td>Statutes can supersede case law</td>
<td>Legislative</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div class="key_takeaways editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_s01_n01">
<h3 class="title">Key Takeaways</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_s01_l01">
<li>The three branches of government are the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch.</li>
<li>The head of the federal legislative branch of government is Congress. The head of the state legislative branch of government is the state legislature.</li>
<li>The Senate represents every state equally because each state has two senators. The House of Representatives represents each citizen equally because states are assigned representatives based on their population.</li>
<li>The head of the federal executive branch of government is the president. The head of each state executive branch of government is the governor.</li>
<li>The head of the federal judicial branch of government is the US Supreme Court. The head of each state judicial branch of government is the highest-level state appellate court.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="exercises editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_s01_n02">
<h3 class="title">Exercises</h3>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_s01_p02">Answer the following questions. Check your answers using the answer key at the end of the chapter.</p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s02_s03_s01_l02">
<li>A mayor enacts a policy that prohibits police officers in his city from enforcing a state law prohibiting the possession and use of marijuana. The mayor’s policy specifically states that within the city limits, marijuana is legal to possess and use. Which constitutional principle is the mayor violating? Which branch of government should check and balance the mayor’s behavior in this matter?</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer</em>, 343 U.S. 579 (1952). In <em class="emphasis">Youngstown</em>, President Truman seized control of steel mills to avert a strike, using his authority as commander in chief of the armed forces. President Truman wanted to ensure steel production during the Korean War. Did the US Supreme Court uphold President Truman’s action? Why or why not? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/343/579/">http://supreme.justia.com/us/343/579/</a>.</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">Hamdi v. Rumsfeld</em>, 542 U.S. 507 (2004). In <em class="emphasis">Hamdi</em>, the US Supreme Court reviewed the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s decision prohibiting the release of a US citizen who was held as an enemy combatant in Virginia during the Afghanistan War. The citizen’s detention was based on a federal statute that deprived him of the opportunity to consult with an attorney or have a trial. Did the US Supreme Court defer to the federal statute? Why or why not? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6173897153146757813&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6173897153146757813&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr</a>.</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03" condition="start-of-chunk" version="5.0" lang="en">
<h2 class="title editable block">
<span class="title-prefix">2.3</span> The Court System</h2>
<div class="learning_objectives editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_n01">
<h3 class="title">Learning Objectives</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_l01">
<li>Compare federal and state courts.</li>
<li>Define jurisdiction.</li>
<li>Compare original and appellate jurisdiction.</li>
<li>Identify the federal courts and determine each court’s jurisdiction.</li>
<li>Identify the state courts and determine each court’s jurisdiction.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_p01">Every state has <em class="emphasis">two</em> court systems: the <em class="emphasis">federal</em> court system, which is the same in all fifty states, and the <em class="emphasis">state</em> court system, which varies slightly in each state. Federal courts are fewer in number than state courts. Because of the Tenth Amendment, discussed earlier in <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch02_s01#storm_1.0-ch02_s01_s02">Section 2.1.2 "The Scope of State Law"</a>, most laws are state laws and therefore most legal disputes go through the state court system.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_p02">Federal courts are exclusive; they adjudicate only <em class="emphasis">federal</em> matters. This means that a case can go through the federal court system only if it is based on a federal <em class="emphasis">statute</em> or the federal <em class="emphasis">Constitution</em>. One exception is called <strong class="emphasis bold">diversity of citizenship</strong>.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_007">28 U.S.C. § 1332, accessed August 30, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1332.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1332.html</a>.</span> If citizens from different states are involved in a civil lawsuit and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, the lawsuit can take place in federal court. All federal <em class="emphasis">criminal prosecutions</em> take place in federal courts.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_p03">State courts are nonexclusive; they can adjudicate state or federal matters. Thus an individual who wants to sue civilly for a federal matter has the option of proceeding in state or federal court. In addition, someone involved in a lawsuit based on a federal statute or the federal Constitution can remove a lawsuit filed in state court to federal court.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_008">28 U.S.C. § 1441 et. seq., accessed August 30, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1441.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1441.html</a>.</span> All state <em class="emphasis">criminal prosecutions</em> take place in state courts.</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Jurisdiction</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s01_p01">Determining which court is appropriate for a particular lawsuit depends on the concept of <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">jurisdiction</a><span class="glossdef">Either a court’s power to hear a case or a court’s authority over a geographic area.</span></span>. Jurisdiction has two meanings. A court’s jurisdiction is the power or authority to hear the case in front of it. If a court does not have jurisdiction, it cannot hear the case. Jurisdiction can also be a geographic area over which the court’s authority extends.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s01_p02">There are two prominent types of court jurisdiction. <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">Original jurisdiction</a><span class="glossdef">A court’s power to hear a trial and accept evidence.</span></span> means that the court has the power to hear a trial. Usually, only <em class="emphasis">one</em> opportunity exists for a trial, although some actions result in both a criminal and a civil trial, discussed previously in <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch01#storm_1.0-ch01">Chapter 1 "Introduction to Criminal Law"</a>. During the trial, evidence is presented to a <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">trier of fact</a><span class="glossdef">The decision maker at trial; could be a judge or jury.</span></span>, which can be either a judge or a jury. The trier of fact determines the facts of a dispute and decides which party prevails at trial by applying the law to those facts. Once the trial has concluded, the next step is an appeal. During an appeal, <em class="emphasis">no evidence is presented</em>; the appellate court simply reviews what took place at trial and determines whether or not any major errors occurred.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s01_p03">The power to hear an appeal is called <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">appellate jurisdiction</a><span class="glossdef">A court’s power to hear an appeal and review a trial for error.</span></span>. Courts that have appellate jurisdiction review the <strong class="emphasis bold">trial record</strong> for error. The trial record includes a court reporter’s <strong class="emphasis bold">transcript</strong>, which is typed notes of the words spoken during the trial and pretrial hearings. In general, with exceptions, appellate courts cannot review a trial record until the trial has ended with a <em class="emphasis">final judgment</em>. Once the appellate court has made its review, it has the ability to take three actions. If it finds no compelling or prejudicial errors, it can <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">affirm</a><span class="glossdef">An appellate court’s power to uphold a lower court decision.</span></span> the judgment of the trial court, which means that the judgment remains the same. If it finds a significant error, it can <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">reverse</a><span class="glossdef">An appellate court’s power to change a lower court decision.</span></span> the judgment of the trial court, which means that the judgment becomes the opposite (the winner loses, the loser wins). It can also <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">remand</a><span class="glossdef">An appellate court’s power to send a case back to the trial court, with instructions.</span></span>, which means send the case back to the trial court, with instructions. After remand, the trial court can take action that the appellate court cannot, such as adjust a sentence or order a new trial.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s01_p04">Some courts have only original jurisdiction, but most courts have a little of original and appellate jurisdiction. The US Supreme Court, for example, is primarily an appellate court with appellate jurisdiction. However, it also has original jurisdiction in some cases, as stated in the Constitution, Article III, § 2, clause 2: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction.”</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s01_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Example of Original and Appellate Jurisdiction</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s01_s01_p01">Paulina is prosecuted for the attempted murder of Ariana. Paulina is represented by public defender Pedro. At Paulina’s trial, in spite of Pedro’s objections, the judge rules that Paulina’s polygraph examination results are admissible, but prohibits the admission of certain witness testimony. Paulina is found guilty and appeals, based on the judge’s evidentiary rulings. While Pedro is writing the appellate brief, he discovers case precedent barring the admission of polygraph examination results. Pedro <em class="emphasis">can include</em> the case precedent in his appellate brief but <em class="emphasis">not the prohibited witness testimony</em>. The appellate court has the jurisdiction to hold that the objection was improperly overruled by the trial court, but is limited to reviewing the trial record for error. The appellate court <em class="emphasis">lacks</em> the jurisdiction to admit new evidence not included in the trial record.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s02">
<h2 class="title editable block">The Federal Courts</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s02_p01">For the purpose of this book, the focus is the federal trial court and the intermediate and highest level appellate courts because these courts are most frequently encountered in a criminal prosecution. Other federal specialty courts do exist but are not discussed, such as bankruptcy court, tax court, and the court of military appeals.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s02_p02">The federal trial court is called the <strong class="emphasis bold">United States District Court</strong>. Large states like California have more than one district court, while smaller states may have only one. District courts hear all the federal trials, including civil and criminal trials. As stated previously, a dispute that involves only state law, or a state criminal trial, cannot proceed in district court. The exception to this rule is the diversity of citizenship exception for civil lawsuits.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s02_p03">After a trial in district court, the loser gets one <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">appeal of right</a><span class="glossdef">A party is guaranteed an appeal if grounds are present.</span></span>. This means that the intermediate appellate federal court <em class="emphasis">must</em> hear an appeal of the district court trial if there are sufficient grounds. The intermediate appellate court in the federal system is the <strong class="emphasis bold">United States Court of Appeals</strong>. There is less federal law than state law, so only thirteen US Courts of Appeals exist for all fifty states. The US Courts of Appeals are spread out over thirteen judicial circuits and are also referred to as Circuit Courts.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s02_p04">Circuit Courts have appellate jurisdiction and can review the district court criminal and civil trials for error. The Circuit Court reviews only trials that are federal in nature, with the exception of civil lawsuits brought to the district court under diversity of citizenship. As noted in <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch01#storm_1.0-ch01">Chapter 1 "Introduction to Criminal Law"</a>, the federal Constitution governs criminal trials, so <em class="emphasis">only a guilty defendant</em> can appeal. In general, with exceptions, appeal of a not-guilty verdict (also called an <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">acquittal</a><span class="glossdef">A not-guilty verdict.</span></span>) violates a defendant’s double jeopardy protection.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s02_p05">After a Circuit Court appeal, the loser has one more opportunity to appeal to the highest-level federal appellate court, which is the <strong class="emphasis bold">United States Supreme Court</strong>. The US Supreme Court is the highest court in the country and is located in Washington, DC, the nation’s capital. The US Supreme Court has eight associate justices and one chief justice: all serve a lifetime appointment.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s02_p06">The US Supreme Court is a <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">discretionary court</a><span class="glossdef">A court that can accept or reject appeals.</span></span>, meaning it does not have to hear appeals. Unlike the Circuit Courts, the US Supreme Court can pick and choose which appeals it wants to review. The method of applying for review with the US Supreme Court is called filing a petition for a <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">writ of certiorari</a><span class="glossdef">A petition that must be granted to reach the United States Supreme Court.</span></span>.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s02_p07">Any case from a Circuit Court, or a case <em class="emphasis">with a federal matter at issue</em> from a state’s highest-level appellate court, can petition for a writ of certiorari. If the writ is granted, the US Supreme Court reviews the appeal. If the writ is denied, which it is the majority of the time, the ruling of the Circuit Court or state high court is the final ruling. For this reason, the US Supreme Court reverses many cases that are accepted for review. If the US Supreme Court wants to “affirm” the intermediate appellate court ruling, all it has to do is deny the petition and let the lower court ruling stand.</p>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03">
<h2 class="title editable block">The State Courts</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_p01">For the purpose of this book, a representative state court system is reviewed. Slight variations in this system may occur from state to state.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_p02">Most states offer their citizens a “people’s court,” typically called small claims court. <strong class="emphasis bold">Small claims court</strong> is a civil court designed to provide state citizens with a low-cost option to resolve disputes where the amount in controversy is minimal. A traditional small claims court only has the jurisdiction to award money damages. This means that it cannot adjudicate criminal matters or family court matters such as granting a petition for divorce. Small claims courts also limit the amount of money damages available, typically less than $10,000.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_p03">Small claims court has special rules that make it amenable to the average individual. Attorneys cannot represent clients in small claims court, although they certainly can represent themselves just like any other individual. Small claims court proceedings are generally informal, and usually no court reporter types what is said. Therefore, no court record exits for appeal. Small claims court <em class="emphasis">appeals</em> are the exception to the general rule and are usually new trials where evidence is accepted.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_p04">States generally have a <strong class="emphasis bold">state trial court</strong> that can also be the appellate court for small claims court appeals. This trial court is usually called superior court, circuit court, or county court. State trial courts are generally all-purpose and hear civil litigation matters, state criminal trials, and nonlitigation cases including family law, wills and probate, foreclosures, and juvenile adjudications. States can, however, create “specialty courts” to hear special matters and free up the trial courts for basic criminal prosecutions and civil litigation trials. Some states divide their trial courts into lower and higher levels. The lower-level trial court adjudicates infractions and misdemeanors, along with civil lawsuits with a smaller amount in controversy. The higher-level trial court adjudicates felonies and civil lawsuits with a higher amount in controversy.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_p05">The intermediate appellate court for the state court system is usually called the <strong class="emphasis bold">state court of appeals</strong>, although some smaller or low-population states may have only <em class="emphasis">one</em> appellate court called the <strong class="emphasis bold">state supreme court</strong>. The state courts of appeal provide appeals of right, meaning they <em class="emphasis">must</em> hear an appeal coming from the state’s trial court if adequate grounds are present. Appeals can be of any case adjudicated in the state trial court. In state criminal prosecutions, as stated earlier in the discussion of federal appeals, only a guilty defendant can appeal without violating the protection against double jeopardy. At the appellate level, the state court of appeal simply reviews the trial court record for error and does not have the <strong class="emphasis bold">jurisdiction</strong> to hear new trials or accept evidence.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_p06">The highest appellate court for the state court system is usually called the state supreme court. In states that have both intermediate and high-level appellate courts, the state supreme court is a discretionary court that gets to select the appeals it hears, very similar to the US Supreme Court. The state supreme court generally grants a petition for writ of certiorari, or a <strong class="emphasis bold">petition for review</strong>, if it decides to hear a civil or criminal case coming out of the state court of appeal. If review is denied, the state court of appeal ruling is the final ruling on the case. If review is granted and the state supreme court rules on the case, the loser has one more chance to appeal, <em class="emphasis">if there is a federal matter</em>, to the US Supreme Court.</p>
<div class="figure full editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 2.7</span> Diagram of the Court System</p>
<img src="section_06/8db5a0e410634d2c11ac0b9dabe48889.jpg">
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_p07"></p>
<div class="key_takeaways editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_n01">
<h3 class="title">Key Takeaways</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_l01">
<li>Federal courts are exclusive and hear only federal matters or cases involving diversity of citizenship. State courts are nonexclusive and can hear state and federal matters. All federal criminal prosecutions take place in federal court, and all state criminal prosecutions take place in state court.</li>
<li>Jurisdiction is either the court’s power to hear a matter or a geographic area over which a court has authority.</li>
<li>Original jurisdiction is a court’s power to hear a trial and accept evidence. Appellate jurisdiction is a court’s power to hear an appeal and review the trial for error.</li>
<li>Three federal courts adjudicate criminal matters: the trial court, which is called the United States District Court; the intermediate court of appeal, which is called the United States Court of Appeals or Circuit Court; and the high court of appeal, which is called the United States Supreme Court. The district court has original jurisdiction; the Circuit Court and US Supreme Court have primarily appellate jurisdiction.</li>
<li>State courts are usually limited to four, and only three adjudicate criminal matters. Small claims court is a “people’s court” and hears only civil matters with a low threshold of damages. The state trial court, often called superior, circuit, or county court, is the trial court for the state system. Some states have an intermediate court of appeal, which is generally called the state court of appeals. Some states have a high court of appeal, which is generally called the state supreme court. The trial court has original jurisdiction; the state court of appeal and state supreme court primarily have appellate jurisdiction.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="exercises editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_n02">
<h3 class="title">Exercises</h3>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_p08">Answer the following questions. Check your answers using the answer key at the end of the chapter.</p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s03_s03_l02">
<li>Jenna sues Max for $25,000, based on a car accident that occurs in Indiana. Jenna loses at trial and appeals to the highest state appellate court in Indiana, where she loses again. Can Jenna appeal her case to the US Supreme Court? Why or why not?</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">United States v. P.H.E., Inc.</em>, 965 F.2d 848 (1992). In <em class="emphasis">P.H.E., Inc.</em>, the defendant never went to trial but was <em class="emphasis">indicted</em>. The defendant challenged the indictment, which was upheld by the trial court. The government claimed that the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit could not hear an appeal of the trial court’s decision, because there was never a “final judgment.” Did the Circuit Court agree? Why or why not? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16482877108359401771&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16482877108359401771&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr</a>.</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">Hertz Corp. v. Friend</em>, 130 S. Ct. 1181 (2010). How did the US Supreme Court determine citizenship of a <em class="emphasis">corporation</em> for the purpose of diversity jurisdiction? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11481058059843290042&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11481058059843290042&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr</a>.</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04" condition="start-of-chunk" version="5.0" lang="en">
<h2 class="title editable block">
<span class="title-prefix">2.4</span> The Burden of Proof</h2>
<div class="learning_objectives editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_n01">
<h3 class="title">Learning Objectives</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_l01">
<li>Define the burden of proof.</li>
<li>Distinguish between the burden of production and the burden of persuasion.</li>
<li>Compare the civil and criminal burden of proof.</li>
<li>Compare inference and presumption.</li>
<li>Compare circumstantial and direct evidence.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_p01">The key to the success of a civil or criminal trial is meeting the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">burden of proof</a><span class="glossdef">An obligation to prove a disputed charge, allegation, or defense.</span></span>. A <em class="emphasis">failure</em> to meet the burden of proof is also a common ground for appeal. In this section, you learn the burden of proof for the plaintiff, prosecution, and defendant. You also are introduced to different classifications of evidence and evidentiary rules that can change the outcome of the trial.</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Definition of the Burden of Proof</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_p01">The burden of proof is a party’s responsibility to prove a disputed charge, allegation, or defense.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_009">Yourdictionary.com, “Definition of Burden of Proof,” accessed September 26, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.yourdictionary.com/burden-of-proof">http://www.yourdictionary.com/burden-of-proof</a>.</span> The burden of proof has two components: the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">burden of production</a><span class="glossdef">The duty to present evidence to the trier of fact.</span></span> and the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">burden of persuasion</a><span class="glossdef">The duty to convince the trier of fact to a certain standard.</span></span>. The burden of production is the obligation to <em class="emphasis">present</em> evidence to the judge or jury. The burden of persuasion is the duty to <em class="emphasis">convince</em> the judge or jury to a certain standard, such as <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">beyond a reasonable doubt</a><span class="glossdef">The burden of proof in a criminal case, which must be enough compelling evidence to overcome the defendant’s presumption of innocence.</span></span>, which is defined shortly. This standard is simply a measuring point and is determined by examining the quantity and quality of the evidence presented. “Meeting the burden of proof” means that a party has introduced enough compelling evidence to reach the standard defined in the burden of persuasion.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_p02">The plaintiff or prosecutor generally has the burden of proving the case, including every element of it. The defendant often has the burden of proving any defense. The trier of fact determines whether a party met the burden of proof at trial. The trier of fact would be a judge in a nonjury or <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">bench trial</a><span class="glossdef">A trial where the trier of fact is a judge, rather than a jury.</span></span>. In a <em class="emphasis">criminal</em> case, the trier of fact is almost always a jury because of the right to a jury trial in the Sixth Amendment. Jurors are not legal experts, so the judge explains the burden of proof in jury instructions, which are a common source of appeal.</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Burden of Proof in a Civil Case</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s01_p01">Burdens of proof vary, depending on the type of case being tried. The plaintiff’s burden of proof in a civil case is called <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">preponderance of evidence</a><span class="glossdef">The burden of proof for the plaintiff and defendant in a civil trial, and for some defenses in a criminal prosecution, which is enough evidence to prove that it is more likely than not that the party should prevail.</span></span>. Preponderance of evidence requires the plaintiff to introduce slightly more or slightly better evidence than the defense. This can be as low as 51 percent plaintiff to 49 percent defendant. When preponderance of evidence is the burden of proof, the judge or jury must be convinced that it is “more likely than not” that the defendant is liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. Preponderance of evidence is a fairly low standard, but the plaintiff must still produce more and better evidence than the defense. If the plaintiff offers evidence of questionable quality, the judge or jury can find that the burden of proof is not met and the plaintiff loses the case.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s01_p02">The defendant’s burden of proof when proving a defense in a civil case is also preponderance of evidence. For example, in the O. J. Simpson civil case discussed in <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch01#storm_1.0-ch01">Chapter 1 "Introduction to Criminal Law"</a>, O. J. Simpson failed to meet the burden of proving the defense of <em class="emphasis">alibi</em>. The defendant does not always have to prove a defense in a civil case. If the plaintiff does not meet the burden of proof, the defendant is victorious without having to present <em class="emphasis">any evidence at all</em>.</p>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s02">
<h2 class="title editable block">Burden of Proof in a Criminal Prosecution</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s02_p01">The prosecution’s burden of proof in a criminal case is the most challenging burden of proof in law; it is <strong class="emphasis bold">beyond a reasonable doubt</strong>. Judges have struggled with a definition for this burden of proof. As Chief Justice Shaw stated nearly a century ago,</p>
<span class="blockquote block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s02_bl01">
<p class="para editable" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s02_p02">[w]hat is reasonable doubt? It is a term often used, probably pretty well understood, but not easily defined. It is not mere possible doubt; because every thing relating to human affairs, and depending on moral evidence, is open to some possible or imaginary doubt. It is that state of the case, which, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence, leaves the minds of jurors in that condition that they cannot say they feel an abiding conviction, to a moral certainty, of the truth of the charge.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_010"><em class="emphasis">Commonwealth v. Webster</em>, 59 Mass. 295, 320 (1850), accessed September 26, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/59/59mass295.html">http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/59/59mass295.html</a>.</span></p>
</span>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s02_p03">In general, the prosecution’s evidence must overcome the defendant’s <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">presumption of innocence</a><span class="glossdef">The trier of fact must begin a criminal trial concluding that the defendant is innocent.</span></span>, which the Constitution guarantees as due process of law.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_011"><em class="emphasis">In re Winship</em>, 397 U.S. 358 (1970), accessed September 26, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0397_0358_ZO.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0397_0358_ZO.html</a>.</span> This fulfills the policy of criminal prosecutions, which is to punish the guilty, not the innocent. If even a slight chance exists that the defendant is innocent, the case most likely lacks convincing and credible evidence, and the trier of fact should acquit the defendant.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s02_p04">States vary as to their requirements for the defendant’s burden of proof when asserting a defense in a criminal prosecution.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_012">Findlaw.com, “The Insanity Defense among the States,” findlaw.com website, accessed October 1, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/more-criminal-topics/insanity-defense/the-insanity-defense-among-the-states.html">http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/more-criminal-topics/insanity-defense/the-insanity-defense-among-the-states.html</a>.</span> Different defenses also have different burdens of proof, as is discussed in detail in <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch05#storm_1.0-ch05">Chapter 5 "Criminal Defenses, Part 1"</a> and <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch06#storm_1.0-ch06">Chapter 6 "Criminal Defenses, Part 2"</a>. Some states require the defendant to meet the burden of production, but require the prosecution to thereafter meet the burden of persuasion, <em class="emphasis">disproving</em> the defense to a preponderance of evidence or, in some states, beyond a reasonable doubt. Other states require the defendant to meet the burden of production <em class="emphasis">and</em> the burden of persuasion. In these states, the defendant’s standard is typically preponderance of evidence, <em class="emphasis">not</em> beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant does not always have to prove a defense in a criminal prosecution. If the prosecution does not meet the burden of proof, the defendant is acquitted without having to present any evidence at all.</p>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s03">
<h2 class="title editable block">Example of a Failure to Meet the Burden of Proof</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s03_p01">Ann is on trial for first-degree murder. The only key piece of evidence in Ann’s trial is the murder weapon, which was discovered in Ann’s dresser drawer during a law enforcement search. Before Ann’s trial, the defense makes a motion to suppress the murder weapon evidence because the search warrant in Ann’s case was signed by a judge who was inebriated and mentally incompetent. The defense is successful with this motion, and the judge rules that the murder weapon is <em class="emphasis">inadmissible</em> at trial. The prosecution decides to proceed anyway. If there is no other convincing and credible evidence of Ann’s guilt, Ann does not need to put on a defense in this case. The prosecution will fail to meet the burden of proof and Ann will be acquitted.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s01_s03_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 2.8</span> Diagram of the Criminal Burden of Proof</p>
<img src="section_06/434a1e5ad595acf7e93a66e36a3b42c0.jpg">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s02">
<h2 class="title editable block">Inference and Presumption</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s02_p01">Parties can use two tools to help meet the burden of proof: <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">inference</a><span class="glossdef">A conclusion the trier of fact may make.</span></span> and <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">presumption</a><span class="glossdef">A conclusion the trier of fact must make.</span></span>. Jury instructions can include inferences and presumptions and are often instrumental in the successful outcome of a case.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s02_p02">An inference is a conclusion that the judge or jury <em class="emphasis">may</em> make under the circumstances. An inference is never mandatory but is a choice. For example, if the prosecution proves that the defendant punched the victim in the face after screaming, “I hate you!” the judge or jury can infer that the punch was thrown intentionally.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s02_p03">A presumption is a conclusion that the judge or jury <em class="emphasis">must</em> make under the circumstances. As stated previously, all criminal defendants are presumed innocent. Thus the judge or jury <em class="emphasis">must</em> begin any criminal trial concluding that the defendant is not guilty.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s02_p04">Presumptions can be <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">rebuttable</a><span class="glossdef">Can be overcome with evidence.</span></span> or <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">irrebuttable</a><span class="glossdef">Cannot be overcome with evidence.</span></span>. A party can disprove a <em class="emphasis">rebuttable</em> presumption. The prosecution can rebut the presumption of innocence with evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. An irrebuttable presumption is irrefutable and <em class="emphasis">cannot</em> be disproved. In some jurisdictions, it is an irrebuttable presumption that children under the age of seven are incapable of forming criminal intent. Thus in these jurisdictions children under the age of seven cannot be criminally prosecuted (although they may be subject to a juvenile adjudication proceeding).</p>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03">
<h2 class="title editable block">Circumstantial and Direct Evidence</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_p01">Two primary classifications are used for evidence: <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">circumstantial evidence</a><span class="glossdef">A type of evidence that indirectly proves a fact.</span></span> or <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">direct evidence</a><span class="glossdef">A type of evidence that directly proves a fact.</span></span>.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_p02">Circumstantial evidence indirectly proves a fact. Fingerprint evidence is usually circumstantial. A defendant’s fingerprint at the scene of the crime <em class="emphasis">directly</em> proves that the defendant placed a finger at that location. It <em class="emphasis">indirectly</em> proves that because the defendant was present at the scene and placed a finger there, the defendant committed the crime. Common examples of circumstantial evidence are fingerprint evidence, DNA evidence, and blood evidence. Criminal cases relying on circumstantial evidence are more difficult for the prosecution because circumstantial evidence leaves room for doubt in a judge’s or juror’s mind. However, circumstantial evidence such as DNA evidence can be very reliable and compelling, so the prosecution can and often does meet the burden of proof using <em class="emphasis">only</em> circumstantial evidence.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_p03">Direct evidence directly proves a fact. For example, eyewitness testimony is often direct evidence. An eyewitness testifying that he or she saw the defendant commit the crime <em class="emphasis">directly</em> proves that the defendant committed the crime. Common examples of direct evidence are eyewitness testimony, a defendant’s confession, or a video or photograph of the defendant committing the crime. Criminal cases relying on direct evidence are easier to prove because there is less potential for reasonable doubt. However, direct evidence can be unreliable and is not necessarily preferable to circumstantial evidence. If an eyewitness is <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">impeached</a><span class="glossdef">When a witness is made to appear untruthful.</span></span>, which means he or she loses credibility, the witness’s testimony lacks the evidentiary value of reliable circumstantial evidence such as DNA evidence.</p>
<div class="table block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_t01" frame="all">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Table 2.2</span> Comparison of Circumstantial and Direct Evidence in a Burglary Case</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Evidence</th>
<th>Circumstantial</th>
<th>Direct</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Fiber from the defendant’s coat found in a residence that has been burglarized</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>No—directly proves <strong class="emphasis bold">presence at the scene</strong>, not that the defendant committed burglary</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GPS evidence indicating the defendant drove to the burglarized residence</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>No—same explanation as fiber evidence</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Testimony from an eyewitness that she saw the defendant go into the backyard of the burglarized residence</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>No—could prove trespassing because it directly proves <strong class="emphasis bold">presence at the scene</strong>, but it does not directly prove burglary</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Surveillance camera footage of the defendant purchasing burglar tools</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>No—does not directly prove they were used on the residence</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cell phone photograph of the defendant burglarizing the residence</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>Yes—directly proves that the defendant committed the crime</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Witness testimony that the defendant confessed to burglarizing the residence</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>Yes—directly proves that the defendant committed the crime</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pawn shop receipt found in the defendant’s pocket for items stolen from the residence</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>No—directly proves that the items were pawned, not stolen</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div class="callout block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_n01">
<h3 class="title">Casey Anthony Trial Video</h3>
<p class="simpara">Casey Anthony Verdict: Found Not Guilty of Murder</p>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_p06">In this video, the jury foreperson in the Casey Anthony trial reads the trial verdict. Casey Anthony was acquitted of murder, manslaughter, and child abuse of her daughter, Caylee Anthony. The evidence in the case was all <em class="emphasis">circumstantial</em>, and the coroner did not determine the cause of the victim’s death.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_013">David Lohr, “Casey Anthony Verdict: NOT GUILTY of First-Degree Murder,” Huffingtonpost.com website, accessed August 24, 2011, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/05/casey-anthony-trial-verdict_n_890173.html#s303265&title=Casey_Anthony_Verdict">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/05/casey-anthony-trial-verdict_n_890173.html#s303265&title=Casey_Anthony_Verdict</a>.</span></p>
<div class="mediaobject">
<a data-iframe-code='<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3H6YxAEVJdY" condition="http://img.youtube.com/vi/3H6YxAEVJdY/0.jpg" vendor="youtube" width="450" height="340" scalefit="1"></iframe>' href="http://www.youtube.com/v/3H6YxAEVJdY" class="replaced-iframe" onclick="return replaceIframe(this)">(click to see video)</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="key_takeaways editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_n02">
<h3 class="title">Key Takeaways</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_l01">
<li>The burden of proof is a party’s obligation to prove a charge, allegation, or defense.</li>
<li>The burden of production is the duty to present evidence to the trier of fact. The burden of persuasion is the duty to convince the trier of fact to a certain standard, such as preponderance of evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt.</li>
<li>
<p class="para">The civil burden of proof is preponderance of evidence, for both the plaintiff and the defendant. The criminal burden of proof for the prosecution is beyond a reasonable doubt.</p>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_l02">
<li>The criminal burden of proof for the defense is generally preponderance of evidence. States vary on whether they require the criminal defendant to meet both the burden of production and persuasion or just the burden of production. Different defenses also require different burdens of proof.</li>
<li>In states that require the defendant to meet only the burden of production, the prosecution must disprove the defense to a preponderance of evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt, depending on the state and on the defense.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>An inference is a conclusion the trier of fact may make, if it chooses to. A presumption is a conclusion the trier of fact must make. A rebuttable presumption can be disproved; an irrebuttable presumption cannot.</li>
<li>Circumstantial evidence indirectly proves a fact. A fingerprint at the scene of the crime, for example, indirectly proves that because the defendant was present at the scene, the defendant committed the crime. Direct evidence directly proves a fact. If the defendant confesses to a crime, for example, this is direct evidence that the defendant committed the crime.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="exercises editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_n03">
<h3 class="title">Exercises</h3>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_p04">Answer the following questions. Check your answers using the answer key at the end of the chapter.</p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s04_s03_l03">
<li>Bria is asserting the insanity defense in her criminal prosecution for murder. In Bria’s state, defendants have the burden of production and persuasion to a preponderance of evidence when proving the insanity defense. Bria offers her own testimony that she is insane and incapable of forming criminal intent. Will Bria be successful with her defense? Why or why not?</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">Patterson v. New York</em>, 432 U.S. 197 (1977). In <em class="emphasis">Patterson</em>, the defendant was on trial for murder. New York law reduced murder to manslaughter if the defendant proved extreme emotional disturbance to a <strong class="emphasis bold">preponderance of evidence</strong>. Did the US Supreme Court hold that it is <em class="emphasis">constitutional</em> to put this burden on the defense, rather than forcing the prosecution to disprove extreme emotional disturbance beyond a reasonable doubt? Which part of the Constitution did the Court analyze to justify its holding? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/432/197/case.html">http://supreme.justia.com/us/432/197/case.html</a>.</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">Sullivan v. Louisiana</em>, 508 U.S. 275 (1993). In <em class="emphasis">Sullivan</em>, the jury was given a constitutionally deficient jury instruction on beyond a reasonable doubt. Did the US Supreme Court hold that this was a prejudicial error requiring reversal of the defendant’s conviction for murder? Which part of the Constitution did the Court rely on in its holding? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1069192289025184531&hl=en&as_sdt=2002&as_vis=1">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1069192289025184531&hl=en&as_sdt=2002&as_vis=1</a>.</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05" condition="start-of-chunk" version="5.0" lang="en">
<h2 class="title editable block">
<span class="title-prefix">2.5</span> End-of-Chapter Material</h2>
<div class="callout editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n01">
<h3 class="title">Summary</h3>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_p01">The United States’ system of government is called federalism and consists of one federal government regulating issues of a national concern and separate state governments regulating local issues. The bulk of criminal lawmaking resides with the states because of the police power granted to the states in the Tenth Amendment. Ninety percent of all criminal laws are state laws. Many federal crimes are also state crimes, and a defendant can be prosecuted federally and by a state without triggering double jeopardy protection. If a federal statute exists on an issue, a state statute cannot conflict with it because of the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.</p>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_p02">The Constitution sets forth three branches of government. The legislative branch consists of Congress and has the authority to create laws. The executive branch is headed by the president of the United States and has the authority to enforce the laws created by the legislative branch. The judicial branch is headed by the US Supreme Court and has the authority to interpret laws and the Constitution. Each branch checks and balances each other, and the judicial branch ensures that no branch oversteps its authority and violates separation of powers. State governments mimic the federal branches of government at the state level and set forth authorities in each state’s constitution.</p>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_p03">The federal court system exclusively adjudicates federal matters and consists primarily of the US District Court, the US Court of Appeals or Circuit Court, and the US Supreme Court. Each state has its own court system consisting primarily of a trial court, intermediate court of appeal, and possibly a high court of appeal. Trial courts have original jurisdiction and can accept evidence. Appellate courts have appellate jurisdiction and are limited to reviewing the trial courts’ decisions for error.</p>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_p04">Each party in a civil or criminal trial must meet a burden of proof, which consists of a burden of producing evidence and a burden of persuading the trier of fact. The burden of proof for a civil plaintiff or defendant is preponderance of evidence, which means that the trier of fact must be convinced it is more likely than not that a party should prevail. The burden of proof for the prosecution in a criminal case is beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a stricter standard than preponderance of evidence and consists of enough compelling evidence to rebut the defendant’s presumption of innocence. The burden of proof for a criminal defense varies but is often preponderance of evidence. Inferences, which are conclusions the trier of fact may make, and presumptions, which are conclusions the trier of fact must make, can help meet the burden of proof. The evidence presented to meet the burden of proof can be circumstantial, which indirectly proves a fact, or direct, which directly proves a fact. Circumstantial evidence leaves room for reasonable doubt, but it can be reliable and the basis of a successful criminal prosecution.</p>
</div>
<div class="exercises editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n02">
<h3 class="title">You Be the Juror</h3>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_p05">Read the prompt, review the case, and then decide whether enough evidence exists to meet the burden of proof. Check your answers using the answer key at the end of the chapter.</p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l01">
<li>The defendant was convicted of possession of a handgun with an altered serial number. The defendant contended that he <em class="emphasis">did not know</em> the serial number had been altered. The prosecution offered evidence that the gun was “shiny” in the location of the serial number. The prosecution also proved that the defendant was in possession of the handgun for a week. Is this sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew the serial number had been altered? Read <em class="emphasis">Robles v. State</em>, 758 N.E.2d 581 (2001). The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7369971752262973607&q=Indiana+2001+%22Robles+v.+State%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7369971752262973607&q= Indiana+2001+%22Robles+v.+State%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5</a>.</li>
<li>The defendant was convicted of attempted first-degree murder of a peace officer when he shot a sheriff. The defendant contended that he <em class="emphasis">did not know</em> the victim was a peace officer. The sheriff was in a vehicle with a whip antenna, was armed, and was well known as a sheriff in Angola Prison, where the defendant was incarcerated previous to the shooting incident. However, the sheriff was in an unmarked car with the red light covered, out of uniform, and his badge was obscured. Is this sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew the victim was a peace officer? Read <em class="emphasis">Donahue v. Burl Cain</em>, 231 F.3d 1000 (2000). The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://openjurist.org/231/f3d/1000/larry-donahue-v-burl-cain">http://openjurist.org/231/f3d/1000/larry-donahue-v-burl-cain</a>.</li>
<li>The defendant was convicted of third-degree robbery, which requires a threat of immediate use of physical force. The defendant entered a McDonald’s restaurant twenty minutes before closing dressed in sunglasses, a leather jacket, and a bandana that covered his hair. The defendant beckoned the clerk and thereafter demanded that she put money from different cash register drawers into his bag. The defendant did not appear armed, nor did he raise his voice or verbally threaten the clerk. Is this sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant threatened immediate use of physical force? Read <em class="emphasis">State v. Hall</em>, 966 P.2d 208 (1998). The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/S44712.htm">http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/S44712.htm</a>.</li>
<li>The defendant was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to sell. The defendant possessed seven individual packages of white powdery substance, but only one package was tested (and it tested positive for cocaine). Is this sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed cocaine with intent to sell? Read <em class="emphasis">Richards v. Florida</em>, No. 4008-4216 (2010). The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.4dca.org/opinions/June%202010/06-09-10/4D08-4216.op.w-dissent.pdf">http://www.4dca.org/opinions/June%202010/06-09-10/4D08-4216.op.w-dissent.pdf</a>.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="callout editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n03">
<h3 class="title">Cases of Interest</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l02">
<li>
<em class="emphasis">Clinton v. Jones</em>, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), discusses separation of powers: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1768307810279741111&q=Clinton+v.+Jones&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1768307810279741111&q= Clinton+v.+Jones&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5</a>.</li>
<li>
<em class="emphasis">Gonzales v. Raich</em>, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), discusses the reach of the commerce clause: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15669334228411787012&q=%22criminal+burden+of+proof%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5&as_ylo=2000">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15669334228411787012&q= %22criminal+burden+of+proof%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5&as_ylo=2000</a>.</li>
<li>
<em class="emphasis">Sabri v. United States</em>, 541 U.S. 600 (2004), discusses the federal government’s ability to criminalize bribery of a local government official: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-44.ZS.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-44.ZS.html</a>.</li>
<li>
<em class="emphasis">U.S. v. Comstock</em>, 627 F.3d 513 (2010), discusses criminal and civil burdens of proof: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15669334228411787012&q=%22criminal+burden+of+proof%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5&as_ylo=2000">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15669334228411787012&q= %22criminal+burden+of+proof%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5&as_ylo=2000</a>.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="callout editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n04">
<h3 class="title">Articles of Interest</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l03">
<li>Connections between federalism and homeland security: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.hsaj.org/?fullarticle=2.3.4">http://www.hsaj.org/?fullarticle=2.3.4</a>
</li>
<li>Video court: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9N3D24G0.htm">http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9N3D24G0.htm</a>
</li>
<li>Burden of proof: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://law.jrank.org/pages/18346/Burden-Proof-Criminal-Civil.html">http://law.jrank.org/pages/18346/Burden-Proof-Criminal-Civil.html</a>
</li>
<li>Federal and state court systems: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.uscourts.gov/EducationalResources/FederalCourtBasics/CourtStructure/UnderstandingFederalAndStateCourts.aspx">http://www.uscourts.gov/EducationalResources/FederalCourtBasics/CourtStructure/UnderstandingFederalAndStateCourts.aspx</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="callout editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n05">
<h3 class="title">Websites of Interest</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l04">
<li>US Supreme Court: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.supremecourt.gov">http://www.supremecourt.gov</a>
</li>
<li>Federal courts: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.uscourts.gov/Home.aspx">http://www.uscourts.gov/Home.aspx</a>
</li>
<li>Civic participation: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.congress.org">http://www.congress.org</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="callout editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n06">
<h3 class="title">Statistics of Interest</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l05">
<li>US Supreme Court: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/356_u_s_supreme_court_cases_filed.html">http://www.allcountries.org/uscensus/356_u_s_supreme_court_cases_filed.html</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="callout block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n07">
<h3 class="title">Answers to Exercises</h3>
<p class="simpara">From <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch02_s01#storm_1.0-ch02_s01">Section 2.1 "Federalism"</a></p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l06">
<li>Congress gets the authority to criminalize conduct involving the Internet from the commerce clause because the Internet includes economic activity and <em class="emphasis">crosses state lines</em>. Both the federal and state government can prosecute the defendant under federal and state criminal statutes for one act without violating double jeopardy.</li>
<li>The US Supreme Court relied on the commerce clause and the Fourteenth Amendment. Specifically, the Court ruled that gender-motivated crimes of violence are not <em class="emphasis">economic activity</em> and do not have a <em class="emphasis">national</em> effect, so the commerce clause does not support federal legislation in this area. Furthermore, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause is targeted at state government action, not <em class="emphasis">individual</em> defendants, so it is likewise inapplicable.</li>
<li>The US Supreme Court held that the Pennsylvania Sedition Act is <em class="emphasis">superseded</em> by the Smith Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2385. Specifically, the Court referenced the supremacy of federal law on the same topic, thereby preempting the state statute.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="callout block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n08">
<h3 class="title">Answers to Exercises</h3>
<p class="simpara">From <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch02_s02#storm_1.0-ch02_s02">Section 2.2 "The Branches of Government"</a></p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l07">
<li>The mayor is violating separation of powers because members of the executive branch cannot invalidate or supersede laws passed by the legislative branch; only the <em class="emphasis">judicial</em> branch is entitled to do this via <em class="emphasis">judicial review</em>. The judicial branch should check and balance this action, <em class="emphasis">if</em> someone attacks the mayor’s policy in court.</li>
<li>The US Supreme Court did not uphold President Truman’s action and ruled that he was violating <em class="emphasis">separation of powers</em>. A statute on point already disallowed the president’s action (the Taft-Hartley Act). The president cannot supersede Congress’s authority by ignoring a constitutional statute that Congress enacted, even during wartime.</li>
<li>The US Supreme Court reversed the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Court held that the judicial branch is not required to allow unconstitutional federal statutes to remain in effect during wartime because of <em class="emphasis">separation of powers</em>. The Court determined that the detainee’s constitutional right to due process allowed him access to an attorney and a court trial, in spite of the federal statute.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="callout block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n09">
<h3 class="title">Answers to Exercises</h3>
<p class="simpara">From <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch02_s03#storm_1.0-ch02_s03">Section 2.3 "The Court System"</a></p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l08">
<li>Jenna cannot appeal to the US Supreme Court because she does not appear to have a <em class="emphasis">federal</em> issue. Parties can appeal from a state’s highest level appellate court directly into the US Supreme Court, but the US Supreme Court is a federal court and only has the jurisdiction to hear federal matters. Jenna cannot meet the criteria of diversity jurisdiction or diversity of citizenship because even if she and Max are citizens of different states, the amount in controversy is too low (it needs to be at least $75,000).</li>
<li>The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that there <em class="emphasis">was jurisdiction</em>, in spite of the absence of a trial. The court also held that the extraordinary circumstances compelled a reversal of the district court order denying a motion to dismiss the defendants’ indictment. The court essentially ruled that the defendants had a right not to be tried.</li>
<li>The US Supreme Court held that a corporation is a citizen of its state of incorporation <em class="emphasis">and</em> the state in which its <em class="emphasis">principal place of business</em> is located. The principal place of business is the “nerve center state,” which is the state that houses the corporate headquarters.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="callout block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n10">
<h3 class="title">Answers to Exercises</h3>
<p class="simpara">From <a class="xref" href="storm_1.0-ch02_s04#storm_1.0-ch02_s04">Section 2.4 "The Burden of Proof"</a></p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l09">
<li>Bria will not be successful with the insanity defense because she cannot meet the burden of proof, which is <strong class="emphasis bold">preponderance of evidence</strong>. Preponderance of evidence is a fairly low standard, but Bria must still convince the trier of fact that it is more likely than not she is insane. She cannot do this with her testimony, standing alone. Clearly, Bria has an important <em class="emphasis">self-interest</em> in eliminating her criminal responsibility in this case. Thus her <em class="emphasis">subjective</em> testimony regarding her own mental state is not compelling enough to meet the 51 percent to 49 percent standard.</li>
<li>The US Supreme Court held that it is <em class="emphasis">constitutional</em> to put the burden of proving extreme emotional disturbance on the defendant, reducing murder to manslaughter. The Court held that this did not relieve the prosecution of the burden of proving every element of murder beyond a reasonable doubt and thus was in compliance with the <strong class="emphasis bold">due process clause</strong> of the Constitution.</li>
<li>The US Supreme Court held that a constitutionally deficient jury instruction on the definition of beyond a reasonable doubt was a <em class="emphasis">prejudicial error</em> and required a reversal of the defendant’s conviction for murder. The Court determined that the improper jury instruction deprived the defendant of his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="callout editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n11">
<h3 class="title">Answer to Law and Ethics Question</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l10">
<li>The federal judge Susan Bolton based her decision on <em class="emphasis">federal preemption</em> and an <em class="emphasis">impermissible state burden</em> on legal resident aliens. The judge reasoned that federal authority to make law in the area of immigration has been confirmed by the US Supreme Court, based on enumerated and implied powers, and the designated sections of the Arizona law conflicted with this authority and are thus preempted.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_014">Order, <em class="emphasis">U.S. v. Arizona</em>, No. CV 10-1413-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court, accessed October 1, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20100729_ARIZONA_DOC.pdf">http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20100729_ARIZONA_DOC.pdf</a>.</span> The judge further held that enforcement of the enjoined sections of the Arizona law would divert federal resources<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_015">Order, <em class="emphasis">U.S. v. Arizona</em>, No. CV 10-1413-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court, accessed October 1, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20100729_ARIZONA_DOC.pdf">http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20100729_ARIZONA_DOC.pdf</a>.</span> and also impermissibly burden legal resident aliens by restricting their liberty while their status is checked.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn02_016">Order, <em class="emphasis">U.S. v. Arizona</em>, No. CV 10-1413-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court, accessed October 1, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20100729_ARIZONA_DOC.pdf">http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20100729_ARIZONA_DOC.pdf</a>.</span>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="callout editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_n12">
<h3 class="title">Answers to You Be the Juror</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch02_s05_l11">
<li>The Indiana Court of Appeals held that there was <strong class="emphasis bold">sufficient</strong> evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew the serial numbers on the gun had been altered. The appearance of the gun and the defendant’s week-long possession were enough for a reasonable juror to infer knowledge.</li>
<li>The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that there was <strong class="emphasis bold">insufficient</strong> evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew the victim was a peace officer. The court held that a reasonable juror could not infer knowledge from the whip antennae and the victim’s job at Angola prison.</li>
<li>The Supreme Court of Oregon held that there was <strong class="emphasis bold">sufficient</strong> evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant threatened immediate use of physical force. The court held that the defendant’s appearance, combined with the lateness of the hour and the demands for money, could be an implicit threat under the circumstances.</li>
<li>The District Court of Appeal of Florida held that there was <strong class="emphasis bold">sufficient</strong> evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed cocaine with the intent to sell. The court pointed out that the criminal statute at issue did not require a specified quantity of cocaine. The court also reasoned that a jury could infer from the packaging and expert testimony that the other packages also contained cocaine.</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id=navbar-bottom class="navbar">
<div class="navbar-part left">
<a href="s05-introduction-to-criminal-law.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-left.png"></a> <a href="s05-introduction-to-criminal-law.html">Previous Chapter</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part middle">
<a href="index.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-up.png"></a> <a href="index.html">Table of Contents</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part right">
<a href="s07-constitutional-protections.html">Next Chapter</a> <a href="s07-constitutional-protections.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-right.png"></a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="shared/book.js"></script>
</body>
</html>