-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
s07-05-the-right-to-bear-arms.html
88 lines (72 loc) · 10.4 KB
/
s07-05-the-right-to-bear-arms.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<link href="shared/bookhub.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<title>The Right to Bear Arms</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id=navbar-top class="navbar">
<div class="navbar-part left">
<a href="s07-04-the-right-to-privacy.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-left.png"></a> <a href="s07-04-the-right-to-privacy.html">Previous Section</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part middle">
<a href="index.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-up.png"></a> <a href="index.html">Table of Contents</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part right">
<a href="s07-06-excessive-punishment.html">Next Section</a> <a href="s07-06-excessive-punishment.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-right.png"></a>
</div>
</div>
<div id="book-content">
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05" condition="start-of-chunk" version="5.0" lang="en">
<h2 class="title editable block">
<span class="title-prefix">3.5</span> The Right to Bear Arms</h2>
<div class="learning_objectives editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_n01">
<h3 class="title">Learning Objective</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_l01">
<li>Ascertain the constitutional parameters of an individual’s right to possess a handgun under the Second Amendment.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_p01">Although the federal Constitution specifically references a right to bear arms in the <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">Second Amendment</a><span class="glossdef">Protects an individual’s right to possess a usable handgun in the home for self-defense.</span></span>, the US Supreme Court has not interpreted this amendment in a significant fashion until recently. The Second Amendment provides “[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Many state constitutions have a similar provision.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn03_041">Eugene Volokh, “State Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms Provisions,” UCLA website, accessed October 22, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/beararms/statecon.htm">http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/beararms/statecon.htm</a>.</span> In 2008, the US Supreme Court explored the Second Amendment and its effect on weapons possession in a case attacking Washington, DC, firearms legislation.<span class="footnote" id="storm_1.0-fn03_042"><em class="emphasis">District of Columbia v. Heller</em>, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008), accessed October 13, 2010, <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html</a>.</span></p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_p02">In <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2739870581644084946&q=District+of+Columbia+v.+Heller&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5"><em class="emphasis">District of Columbia v. Heller</em></a>, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008), the Court affirmed the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in striking provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975. The Court struck the portions of this act that banned the possession of handguns and mandated that all legal firearms must be kept unloaded and disassembled while in the home. Although the District Court held that the Second Amendment applies only to the militia, the US Supreme Court emphasized that the Second Amendment is exercised individually and belongs to all Americans. The Court also expanded previous interpretations of the Second Amendment to cover an individual’s right to possess a usable handgun in the home for self-defense. The <em class="emphasis">Heller</em> case is unprecedented and is the first to address individual handgun possession under the Second Amendment. However, the <em class="emphasis">Heller</em> ruling is narrow and specifically excludes firearms restrictions on <em class="emphasis">felons</em>, the <em class="emphasis">mentally ill</em>, firearm possession in or near <em class="emphasis">schools</em> or government buildings, and the <em class="emphasis">commercial sale</em> of firearms. The <em class="emphasis">Heller</em> decision also fails to extend the Second Amendment’s protections to the <em class="emphasis">states</em> because Washington, DC, is a federal enclave.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_p03">In <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5141154246897960488&q=McDonald+v.+Chicago&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5"><em class="emphasis">McDonald v. Chicago</em></a>, 130 S.Ct. 3020 (2010), the US Supreme Court revisited the gun possession issue by reviewing and rejecting as unconstitutional a handgun ban in the city of Chicago, Illinois. In <em class="emphasis">McDonald</em>, the Court took the extra step of extending the <em class="emphasis">Heller</em> ruling to the states, holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states via its <strong class="emphasis bold">selective incorporation</strong> into the due process clause. However, <em class="emphasis">McDonald</em> did not expand the ruling in <em class="emphasis">Heller</em> in other ways and reemphasized the Heller exceptions of firearms restrictions on felons, the mentally ill, firearm possession in or near schools or government buildings, and the commercial sale of firearms.</p>
<div class="section" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_s01">
<h2 class="title editable block">Example of an Appropriate Restriction on Firearms</h2>
<p class="para editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_s01_p01">Dirk is a public middle-school janitor. Occasionally, with the permission of the principal, Dirk stays overnight in an outbuilding on campus when he works a particularly late shift. Dirk wants to keep a handgun in the outbuilding, for protection. If Dirk’s state has a statute prohibiting the possession of a handgun within one mile of any public school, Dirk <em class="emphasis">cannot</em> keep a handgun in the outbuilding for self-defense. Modern US Supreme Court precedent holds that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a handgun in the home for self-defense. However, this precedent specifically <em class="emphasis">exempts</em> firearm possession near schools. Unless newer precedent expands the ruling to include firearm possession near schools, the statute in Dirk’s state is constitutional.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_s01_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 3.7</span> The Second Amendment</p>
<img src="section_07/660be595759f5be69d8e3d4cb90f2910.jpg">
</div>
<div class="key_takeaways editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_s01_n01">
<h3 class="title">Key Takeaway</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_s01_l01">
<li>Pursuant to recent US Supreme Court precedent, the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a usable handgun in the home for self-defense. This protection does not cover felons, the mentally ill, firearm possession near schools and government buildings, or the commercial sale of firearms.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="exercises editable block" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_s01_n02">
<h3 class="title">Exercises</h3>
<p class="para" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_s01_p02">Answer the following questions. Check your answers using the answer key at the end of the chapter.</p>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="storm_1.0-ch03_s05_s01_l02">
<li>A state court order forbids the defendant from possessing a handgun while on probation. This makes it impossible for the defendant to resume his career as a police officer. How will this court order be analyzed under recent US Supreme Court precedent interpreting the Second Amendment?</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">Lewis v. U.S.</em>, 445 U.S. 55 (1980). In <em class="emphasis">Lewis</em>, the defendant, a felon, was convicted under a federal statute for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The defendant claimed that this was unconstitutional because he was not represented by counsel during his trial on the original felony. The defendant never sought a pardon or reversal of his conviction for the original felony on appeal. Did the US Supreme Court uphold the defendant’s conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1988023855177829800&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1988023855177829800&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr</a>.</li>
<li>Read <em class="emphasis">U.S. v. Lopez</em>, 514 U.S. 549 (1995). In <em class="emphasis">Lopez</em>, the US Supreme Court held that a federal statute prohibiting firearms near schools was unconstitutional because it regulated conduct that had no effect on interstate commerce and thus exceeded Congress’s authority under the commerce clause. If a state enacts a similar statute, would this be constitutional under the Second Amendment? The case is available at this link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18310045251039502778&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18310045251039502778&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr</a>.</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id=navbar-bottom class="navbar">
<div class="navbar-part left">
<a href="s07-04-the-right-to-privacy.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-left.png"></a> <a href="s07-04-the-right-to-privacy.html">Previous Section</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part middle">
<a href="index.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-up.png"></a> <a href="index.html">Table of Contents</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part right">
<a href="s07-06-excessive-punishment.html">Next Section</a> <a href="s07-06-excessive-punishment.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-right.png"></a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="shared/book.js"></script>
</body>
</html>