You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we bring back trivial proofs, i.e. ones provable with a single Refl? I've been leaving them out as they're useless as lemmas due to Idris's strong normalization, but maybe they're still useful as simple sanity checks?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, I wouldn't mind having them around. Since they're trivial they shouldn't slow down the type checker, and they are valid theorems being proven. I thought there was some other reason why you took them out, but if it's just because they can't be relied upon because of the strong norming, then I think simple sanity checking is always good.
Should we bring back trivial proofs, i.e. ones provable with a single
Refl
? I've been leaving them out as they're useless as lemmas due to Idris's strong normalization, but maybe they're still useful as simple sanity checks?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: