rationale behind "pre-patch" changes? #33
FelixSchwarz
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I think I somewhat understand the idea behind these pre-patches now and I have some idea why upstream does not like these. For others looking into this you can also check the (now outdated) branches WIP-PROPOSED-UPSTREAM and WIP-PORTABLE. I gathered some information about upstreaming history in an issue comment. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
What is the rationale behind the "pre-patch" change for mars?
From what I understand you export some functions so you can access these in mars. Would it be possible to write a kind of "shim" which just duplicates these functions so we don't have to patch the kernel? I understand that this is not important for 1&1 which uses its own kernels anyway but I'd be very happy if I could use mars without patching my kernel.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions