You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Add support for shapesys modifiers via a new type of systematic for cabinetry. They would behave somewhat similarly to NormPlusShape, but are independent per bin, would not have a norm/shape split, and would come with Poisson constraint instead of Gaussian constraint. The implementation could probably closely follow NormPlusShape.
Originally posted by Tomoya-Iizawa January 18, 2024
Hello,
I would like to ask if there is any way to implement systematics with decorrelated among bins?
For example, if we have bins [0, 250, 500, 750, 1000] and 2-point shape systematics as ttbar-ME, is it possible to decorrelate by each bin?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Add support for
shapesys
modifiers via a new type of systematic forcabinetry
. They would behave somewhat similarly toNormPlusShape
, but are independent per bin, would not have a norm/shape split, and would come with Poisson constraint instead of Gaussian constraint. The implementation could probably closely followNormPlusShape
.Discussed in #453
Originally posted by Tomoya-Iizawa January 18, 2024
Hello,
I would like to ask if there is any way to implement systematics with decorrelated among bins?
For example, if we have bins [0, 250, 500, 750, 1000] and 2-point shape systematics as ttbar-ME, is it possible to decorrelate by each bin?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: