custom modifiers #1627
-
continuing some discussion around #1625 and #1188 and #850 with those changes it's possible to have a spec:
wherre
where
would this work @balunas @mswiatlo @alexander-held ? from @balunas's post it seems like htere some new parameters |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
Hi @lukasheinrich , This is great, thanks! So in our particular case we do need parameters/constants available but I guess they could be hardcoded into func? I hope @balunas can clarify as he's worked with this more direclty |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi again - Here is an example notebook that implements an dummy funcntio there is still a lot of boilerplate associated witth this which will reduce in folow up PRs |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi again -
we merged #1625 and now we can at least technically make this happen
Here is an example notebook that implements an dummy funcntio
f(k1,k2) = (k1+k2)**2
and adds that only to the signal componenthttps://gist.github.com/lukasheinrich/d100605d5473ea4bfa0980e4f78b01b3
there is still a lot of boilerplate associated witth this which will reduce in folow up PRs