- Rich, Steven
- Creating a new blockchain economy for the first time, where we’re running up against many incompatible local jurisdictional legislation
- Regulators have a primary incentive to protect consumers, and they are trying to understand how to correctly distinguish risks from new types of opportunities
- a16z has specific knowledge on the incoming process navigating the regulatory framework
- Bridge between the current technology environment to bring cooperation between their goals and ours
- Regulation will be an ongoing process to show transparency and compliance, not a one-time rubberstamp
- True sense of partnership:
- Sounding board
- Loudest cheerleader
- Butting heads potentially, to identify the root problems and determine the best solutions
- Uncover as much uncertainty possible
- How do we interact with their other portfolio companies?
- Any value added opportunity will be mutually beneficial
- Their firm has a huge network where we can find many resources
- Gives legitimacy to blockchain and crypto with their Crypto division and it's investment in Maker
- Making the realization of Maker's involvement facilitating this new economy more tangible to the outside
- Its more a conundrum of unknowns that we’re trying to uncover rather than a specific challenge we’re attempting to navigate
- Lots of speculation about both directions of the (token-categorization) debate, but the ambiguity remains
- Need to find clarity as soon as possible or the blockchain economy will continue stalling
- That clarity can gives others in the space context about one workable way to effectively establish operations
- MakerDAO hasn’t been deployed as a fully-capable battleship yet. It’s still currently being built in harbor.
- Token holders are sailors on the ship, as the foundation continues building
- The roles involved in how to run the ship are different from the processes involved in building it
- Keeping the ship running will be up to the MKR holders once empowered
- It’s not a clean switch, needs iterative testing
- Once up and running all decisions will need to be made through decentralized governance, including who will deliver the services, how they will be delivered and when
A substantial amount of collateral will be locked in CDPs in the long run. Maker will have due influence over Ethereum governance as a whole and it could be construed that a16z is purchasing a seat at the table with EF/Ethereum through this. Tweet Referenced Can you share a take on this?
- Scientific governance relies on diligent governance of the system
- It must focus on it’s singular purpose to benefit the organization
- Conversations are ongoing about the results of contentious forks and how dapps will select the majority fork
- Ultimately competition would be driven through incentives to create the best implementation
- Moving to a new (slightly better) version would be trivial with a motivated community
- The comparison is a bit difficult since contracts are deployed once and can’t easily be actively updated
- Extraordinarily active. Will be leading the charge on uncovering the best tactics.
- Joining the crowd as some of the most passionate about the project
- Money is not the only value being delivered by a16z in this deal
- Their full partnership will pay visible dividends
- The results will be clear as the ecosystem continues to develop
- Two way street: We can teach them about the rest of the ecosystem and open them up to significant opportunities as well