-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extend SPARQL Queries to Extract Additional Latin Verb Forms #444
Comments
@KesharwaniArpita can i help with this ?? |
Sure!!! @Otom-obhazi |
KesharwaniArpita#3 |
Ofcourse @Collins-Webdev. Just keep a check on the forms that have been done so you can work efficiently. And you can get he QID from the metadata files in the resources. Thank you for you help!! |
…orms - Add support for extracting present, future, past imperfect, perfect, and pluperfect forms - Include grammatical features (mood, person, number) for each tense - Implement OPTIONAL matching to handle incomplete conjugation data - Add proper PREFIX declarations for all used namespaces - Improve query organization and readability with comments - Add ORDER BY clause and reasonable LIMIT for better results handling Resolves scribe-org#444
Hello @KesharwaniArpita , |
Terms
Languages
Latin
Description
I have been working on SPARQL queries to extract the forms of Latin(Q397) verbs(Q24905), and so far, I have successfully completed the extraction for present tense forms and parts of the future tense. However, given the complexity of Latin verb conjugations and the existence of around 250 sets of grammatical rules, many other forms still need to be covered.
This issue aims to extend the work to include the following verb forms:
Reference:
You can refer to this lexeme on Wikidata for an example of Latin verb lexemes.
Proposed Solution:
Contributions:
I will be happy to work on this contribution and welcome and help anyone who is interested 😄 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: