Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Design Proposal for implementing rkt instead of docker #49

Open
edsealing opened this issue Aug 12, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Design Proposal for implementing rkt instead of docker #49

edsealing opened this issue Aug 12, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@edsealing
Copy link
Contributor

edsealing commented Aug 12, 2018

There have been some strides made in implementing CRI-O compliant runtime engines. CoreOS (now owned by Red Hat) created rkt as a container runtime that improves on the security and standardization over docker.

Since EDCOP generally standardizes on CentOS/RHEL, it may make sense to implement rkt as the container runtime engine for EDCOP. A design proposal would be necessary to outline the advantages/disadvantages of implementing rkt over docker, and how to do it.

Some differences are outline in this CoreOS Blog Post, although these are likely biased toward rkt.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant